UE, CV - even though this is listed as PD-self, it appears to be a photoshopped screenshot from a film. As such, it violates our fair use guidelines since it is not used in any articles. —Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS)00:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image I created before understanding WP:OR -- image is a speculative fictional rank insignia not (now) used by any article. — EEMeltonIV 07:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is listed as a promotional image but the BBC website does not provide any information on use of these images. It also has no FU rationale — WindsorFan13:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; fair use. Publicity images are intended for publicity.
Likely copyright violation. The camera's point of view is impossible for a fan, so unless this guy works for the Associated Press, this is probably a copyvio. From his talk page, he has a history of bad images. — Wafulz15:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, Copyvio, all others in series (miriam2.jpg, miriam3.jpg, miriam4.jpg) already db'd and IfD'd. This one got missed. — Jokestress17:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
The SVG file seems to violate the criteria for fair use, specifically criterion #3 that "Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)." If I am missing something, tell me; in the event that I am not, delete the SVG file and keep the PNG file. --Iamunknown19:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:ALWhiteSoxLogo2.PNG was created to replace the SVG file for use in the White Sox infobox. The SVG file looks horrible aesthetically in that place. Silent Wind of Doom04:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The SVG file seems to violate the criteria for fair use, specifically criterion #3 that "Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)." If I am missing something, tell me; in the event that I am not, delete the SVG file and keep the PNG file. --Iamunknown19:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that SVG is preferred when dealing with digital images that are representations or composites of geometric figures. The problem as I see it is that SVG files, since they are in a vector format, can be scaled to very large proportions without any loss of quality (inasmuch as the file is formatted correctly). Thus, even though they are superior in quality, they fail criterion #3. --Iamunknown05:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
