Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 26

November 26

File:KOST 103.5 XMAS logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Christmas logo for KOST-FM is unnecessary. There is already File:KOST FM 2013.png. Shall we do this every Christmas holidays? George Ho (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being unnecessary. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Christmas version and revert back to the regular non-themed log (hosted on Commons). Uploader tried to override the Commons version and failed so replaced with a local copy. Salavat (talk) 04:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tuisyen002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for copyvio. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tuisyen003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sign itself is copyrightable. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per copyvio. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michele Adamson, Soulclipse 2006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Adamson, unlikely to ever be used or to serve any educational purpose. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for dependence on deleted article. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.” On the work of Johan Grimonprez.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image within the book may not be freely available. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.” On the work of Johan Grimonprez.jpeg. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lunar Magic file icon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted sprites. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use added crediting Nintendo as a the owner. Discussion should be good to be closed now. Salavat (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest changing the tag to {{Non-free computer icon}}, but would Keep as non-free content either way. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 04:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lazybatusu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File page states that "Original picture by Lazybatusu", which shows no obvious connection with the uploader. Can't speedy as no evidence of permission given the age of upload. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mann Edge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: If date is accurate, renewal would be pre-1978, and thus not avaliable on the copyright.gov site. Keeping and assuming no renewal was filed, or no notice. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 08:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming good faith, on the part of the uploader, but does someone want to check for a possible renewal? ( unlikely). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Dunville VC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect identity, obsolete, orphan. I found this photograph on 14 September 2004 when I was having a private viewing at a museum of a scrapbook and photograph album that were compiled by Robert Lambart Dunville (1893-1931). Robert Lambart Dunville was the older brother of John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917), and I assumed that this photograph was of John Spencer Dunville. The museum photocopied the photograph for me and when I returned home I scanned the photocopy. Later I uploaded the photograph to a family history website that I run, to the page http://www.dumville.org/photo_pages/jd1896_pho.html and labelled it as John Spencer Dunville. I assume that the photograph was downloaded from my web page or from Google Images and uploaded to Wikipedia. On 1 November 2016 I showed the photograph to the Assistant Curator of the Household Cavalry Museum at Combermere Barracks in Windsor. He said the cap badge was not for the regiment in which John Spencer Dunville served, the 1st (Royal) Dragoons, but for the regiment in which his brother Robert Lambart Dunville served. I believe the cap badge is for the Grenadier Guards. The youngest brother of Robert Lambart Dunville, William Gustavus Dunville (1900-1956) also served in the Grenadier Guards, and so the photograph could be of Robert Lambart Dunville or William Gustavus Dunville, but it is most probably not of John Spencer Dunville VC, as claimed by the name of the photograph. No pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file, and I am not aware of any pages anywhere else that link to this file. I have uploaded a correct image of John Spencer Dunville VC to Wikipedia Commons: John Spencer Dunville VC (1896-1917).jpg. I would be grateful if John_Dunville_VC.jpg could be deleted from Wikipedia. BwanaHewa (talk) 09:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WION TV logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as fair use czar 17:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not so sure this logo is below TOO as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image seems to be pretty simple when comparing to examples listed on Commons TOO article. Suggest keeping as PD-logo but hosted here as India isn't covered by the Commons article. If however it is deemed above TOO it should be re-licensed to fair use. Salavat (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The logo is complex enough and beyond TOO. It's a protected work. --Mhhossein ^talk 10:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YorkPionners.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Technically unsourced, but FFD rather than CSD given age of image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SchlossBenndorfHistorisch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 08:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Technically unsourced, but FFD over CSD as image is clearly old. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source added. IljaWeber (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2016 (CET)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FC.Genc.Kalemler Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a third party logo, so I am querying the CC license. File is unused so conversion to fair-use can't be advanced immediately. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No source, no author and no info! --Mhhossein ^talk 18:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Library Level 4 Painting.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Library Level 4 Painting.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In use, could this be converted to fair use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially, but it's only used in a gallery. I can restore if someone wants to re-tag as fair use. czar 17:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:E4a Painting Wall.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 17:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:E4a Painting Wall.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In use, could this be converted to fair use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially, but it's only used in a gallery. I can restore if someone wants to re-tag as fair use. czar 17:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's a derivative of another work. Another for license is needed for the paintings. --Mhhossein ^talk 18:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mauwia-fc.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo, so not seeing why this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-licensed for fair use on assumption of lack of experience/knowledge by uploader. Discussion should be good to be closed. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siaraga FC.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 08:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo, so I fail to see how this is Creative Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-licensed for fair use on assumption of lack of experience/knowledge by uploader. Discussion should be good to be closed. Salavat (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CNBC TV18 logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 24#File:CNBC_TV18_logo.png}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TENlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo, CC license but NFUR given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.