Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pgproductions.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheCustomOfLife (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This screenshot of the logo of Procter & Gamble Productions would be appropriate in an infobox on Procter & Gamble Productions if it had ever been an artice, but in a section of Procter & Gamble with no commentary about the image it does not appear to meet WP:NFCCP#8 as it doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, nor does it appear to me to meet the purpose listed in the rationale, "The image is used to identify the brand Procter & Gamble, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the brand, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the brand, and illustrate the nature of the brand in a way that words alone could not convey."  ★  Bigr Tex 00:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tigres UANL.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yxifix (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

When this logo was uploaded, it probably went in the Infobox of Tigres UANL as explained in the rationale's Purpose and "help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey." However, since then it has been moved to a gallery of historic shields and is no longer doing any of those things and no longer meets WP:NFCCP#8 because it does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic."  ★  Bigr Tex 00:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - historical club logos are valid and useful, it probably just needs re-locating to a better section. GiantSnowman 10:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as current.y used in the article, it is a clear fail on WP:NFCC#8 as the image is used simply in gallery. If there were significant sourced commentary about the logo, then it's a different situation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Permission from the copyright holder has not been received. See articles 27 and 29 in ticket:2019030710008064. If permission is received at a later date, then an OTRS again may request undeletion at WP:REFUND. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brendan George McCormack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rwatson1955 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete: This image has not been release freely but c:File:Professor Brendan George McCormack.jpg has an OTRS permission within the same ticket number. ww2censor (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT DELETE The person who took the picture has given permission and did so using the same ticket number as requested to use - I have seen the email from him so please leave this image intact Rwatson1955 (talk) 06:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janet Auchincloss Rutherfurd.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lamro (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This photo is mis-identified at the File level as "Janet Auchincloss Rutherfurd". This is *not* Auchincloss Rutherfurd, it is Theresa Heinz Kerry. (Sorry if XfD is the wrong venue - I'm just not sure as to where to put this Request.)

Note: the file does have an unlicensed notice on it and could possibly be deleted on April 12th.) Shearonink (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Sourced from an unreliable site, other uses of the image such as this one identify the subject as Teresa Heinz as noted by the nominator. This non-free image is not usable for the stated purpose of use in the infobox as the image is for the wrong person. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haløver - They Ain't Got It Right Halover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Matias4000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is a copy on Commons that has also nominated for deletion with the following link provided in the discussion: [1] funplussmart (talk) 23:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.