Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 17

May 17

File:Baden Pattinson.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo from Australia, first published in "1950s". According to {{PD-Australia}}, photos published after 1946 were still copyrighted as of the URAA date, and so the photo is still copyrighted in the United States. Wikiacc (¶) 02:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baha'is at the Danish Embassy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo from Denmark, "circa 1956". According to c:Template:PD-Denmark50, photographs enter the public domain in Denmark 50 years after creation. Since this photo was still copyrighted in Denmark in 1996, it is still copyrighted in the United States. Wikiacc (¶) 02:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brigadier General Colin Keiver.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. As folks have pointed out here, a noncommercial licence is not allowed on Wikipedia. It is not enough for the file to be allowed on Wikipedia, it must also be allowed for reusers. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Official portrait of a Canadian military officer from 2019, tagged PD. According to {{PD-Canada}} it is subject to Crown copyright until 2069. Wikiacc (¶) 02:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly not PD and is under CRown copyright. -- Whpq (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Johny3936 has written a response at File talk:Brigadier General Colin Keiver.jpg. Wikiacc (¶) 18:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw that. It is nonsense. All that quoting simply states that works that are under Crown copyright might not require permission for use if specific criteria are met. But it all starts with the work being under Crown copyright in the first place. -- Whpq (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Whpq, You said it yourself, "Crown copyright might not require permission for use if specific criteria are met". I have met the criteria and I had explained it through what I had responded in File talk:Brigadier General Colin Keiver.jpg. If this is "clearly not PD and is under CRown copyright" then do the duty of explaining how so. As I had stated before "This has been supported by the Crown copyright protected works managed by National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces". Johny3936 (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - You said it yourself. Crown copyright protected works managed by National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces (emphasis added). Using it in a way that doesn't require permission doesn't cause the work to become public domain. -- Whpq (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - Along with your condescending use of language in each and every one of your replies, you have, once again, stated that this is not violating their copyright policies. Please go and thoroughly read through File talk:Brigadier General Colin Keiver.jpg as you will be able to see why it is alright to be used. I even know and have permission from the person in the image which is the most ridiculous part of all of this. Good gracious. Johny3936 (talk) 01:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Johny3936: please see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright, particularly the section entitled "Non-commercial licenses". Wikiacc (¶) 01:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CBM Annotated ALQT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Produced by a private company under contract with the US government. Claimed public domain without a valid reason. Deleted at Commons (deletion discussion). Wikiacc (¶) 02:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on a re-write to the CBM page. These two files are on my list of things to clean up when complete (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Not_fred999/Cleanupsandbox). Feel free to whack.Not fred999 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Liverstucture.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader asserts that the copyright holder "has given their permission that this picture is published on Wikipedia", but it's not clear under what license. Wikiacc (¶) 04:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prof. Yitzhak Mastai, Bar-Ilan University.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A formal PR picture (appears here, for example). It cannot stay on Wikipedia without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISS09292007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Common's duplicate/inferior version. Ras67 (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 02:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. E. Ako-Adjei, a Ghanaian politician.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image is claimed to be freely licensed because its unknown author released it to the public domain. That's not a valid PD claim. The image comes from a publication by the Ghana High Commission in the UK published in 1957. Based on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ghana, this would not be PD until 2027. The subject is deceased and my own search for a freely licensed image did not turn up anything so conversion to non-free is an option. Whpq (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MEGHDAD at Eventim Apollo in 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. There are major issues with the OTRS ticket which are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon. -FASTILY 05:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image is claimed to be public domain but there is insufficient evidence for PD or any specific license. The provided permission link simply states "PS The image is free to be used". Whpq (talk) 19:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update - the uploader has indeicated on my talk page that a permission email has been sent. This nomination is withdrawn so OTRS can review and handle it. -- Whpq (talk) 20:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KickAssComics.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 May 30. FASTILY 01:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KickAssComics.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anti-Fascists resistance in Albania WWII - Kryeziu brothers & Zai Fundo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not PD in the United States. Assuming it's an anon. work, it was PD in Albania in 2013, so it has U.S. copyright until 2038 (per URAA). Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Albania, there is no condition under which the work was in PD in Albania on the URAA date. Wikiacc (¶) 01:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.