Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 April 7

April 7

File:Google chrome memory floor.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of non-free software. I'm not sure whether the UI meets the threshold of originality, but all our screenshots of Windows Task Manager that are in use are marked as non-free. This particular screenshot is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HATcoverJan17.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted magazine cover, needs evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Henrik Magnus von Buddenbrock large.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality compared to File:Henrik Magnus Buddenbrock (1685–1743).jpg from Commons. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 07:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hihocherryo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. F9 copyright violation. Cannot be used as non-free content since a new free picture could be taken without the cover art, see WP:NFC#UUI #13. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of presumably copyrighted board game. Cannot be under a Creative Commons license unless it can be proven that this 1960 game was published without a copyright notice. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, could be converted to fair use and used in Hi Ho! Cherry-O. Salavat (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I noticed that the image is actually linked from that article. However, there was a syntax error that prevented the image from being displayed. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I also just found a higher resolution version of this photograph at a different website. [1] So the "own work" claim is pretty dubious. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Another update: the spinner carries a notice that the game is copyright 2014 by Hasbro. It appears this edition is different than the one released in 1960. [2] So this image is certainly not in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hiloshow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Generally no freedom of panorama for indoor and temporary exhibitions. Needs permission from artist(s) unless it can be shown that these works are old enough to be in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.