Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 5

November 5

File:Jaegerfloater.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality, better alternatives available at c:Category:Jägerbomb (cocktail). ✗plicit 01:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value due to quality. Salavat (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned. Also, you can see the guy's hand in the frame. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 03:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jade Dragon Snow Mountain Peak.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low resolution, better alternatives at c:Category:Jade Dragon Snow Mountain. ✗plicit 01:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 01:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prince Hubertus of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if a) someone can provide a reliable source explicitly describing this image as PD or b) someone is willing to create a fair use claim for this image -FASTILY 10:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claims {{PD-old-70}}, but lacks author information and date of publication. Unclear if this image falls under a free license. ✗plicit 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I emailed the site owner at royaltyguide.nl. They said that they found it back in 2009 in a defunct website called Worldroots, which currently links to brigittegastelancestry.com. The image in question does not exist anymore. I also attempted to go through the Internet Archives to Worldroots.com, but to no avail. Even if I did find the image, the image itself is undated. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 21:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steam Into History logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logo has been replaced by an updated version and this file is no longer used in the Steam into History article. Blue Riband► 15:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, especially since the old logo is no longer in use. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 03:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.