Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 13

October 13

File:HMS Tiger Bay whilst still Argentine service.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of unclear dating; while dated with its upload time, the warship depicted was in service 1978-1982. All photos made after 1975 would still be protected in the US due to URAA restorations. Felix QW (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Right side of AMD-65.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/File:AMD-65.jpg Yann (talk) 09:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This user page of the uploader at the source clarifies that the images can not assumed to be freely licensed. Felix QW (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Italia v Francia Mondiale 1978.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will still be protected by copyright in the US for a very long time, as it was not PD in Argentina in 1996. I am sceptical about possibilities for non-free use, apart from perhaps at Blocco-Juve. Felix QW (talk) 10:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, is still in copyright. Doesn't look like a fair use on any article, I am sceptical about it being fair use on Blocco-Juve, as anyone who attended any match in that era could licence us a photo, thus it fails WP:NFCC#1. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jaime Yankelevich.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While the image was apparently created in 1951, evidence of publication is only provided from 1981. This would be insufficient to render this image PD in the US. I am unsure whether we can assume publication soon after creation for what does not seem like a formal photograph, especially since I also do not know what constitutes "publication" in Argentinian law. Felix QW (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jorgeborelli.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still protected by copyright in the US after URAA restorations. As the subject is still alive, non-free use seems difficult to justify. Felix QW (talk) 10:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:La Menesunda.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To me, this looks derivative of the depicted art installation, whose copyright in Argentina will only expire 70 years after the death of the artist, Marta Minujín, who is still alive. Felix QW (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama in Argentina is contested for buildings and quite certainly not given for art installations like this. Felix QW (talk) 11:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jorge Carrascosa.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file which should still be protected in the US according to {{PD-AR-Photo}}, by the terms of which this image was still copyrighted in Argentina in 1996. Felix QW (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as copyrighted image, without a valid fair use claim (we don't generally allow fair use images of living people where anyone could still photograph them and licence us a free photo instead). Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.