Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 October 14

October 14

File:8 Parche.jpg Baani Sandhu.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused album cover, missing evidence the copyright holder has released it under a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Screenshot from film Wild Dog Dingo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation. No prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded with sourced critical commentary explicitly discussing this image in-depth -Fastily 20:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot is used in the Cast section of The Wild Dog Dingo. The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 22:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep the poster is useless to understanding of the film hence NFCC#3a is not violated. If you insist, I may happily delete the primitive poster. The discussed image is crucial to understand the teenage love drama hence NFCC#8 is OK. It says more than thousand words written by a wikipedian. We do not do critical commentaries on screentshots, so this criticism is irrelevant. "does nothing to increase" is a personal opinion. I think otherwise, that's why I added it. --Altenmann >talk 23:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The image is not the subject of any significant sourced critical commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The image cannot replace that of the poster as the screentshot is not a poster logo, or other such similar identifying image. -- Whpq (talk) 19:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia does not write articles about screenshots. The article is about the film, and the image is used in published critical commentary of the film, such as here or here or [1]. --Altenmann >talk 20:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  There is no substantial critical commentary about the scene that the screenshot represents in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 20:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  The screenshot illustrates the idea of the film: teenage love, not any particular scene. But yes, it is a notable scene and it did receive its share of attention. Added into the article. --Altenmann >talk 20:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It fails the second point of WP:FREER. "Could the subject be adequately conveyed by properly sourced text without using the non-free content at all?" Text can and does adequately describe the contents of the image. ✗plicit 23:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- No it does not. The article about the film, not about the screenshot, and the images are supposed to complement the text. Many are using this image when writing about the3 film and wikipedians vehemently resist to do the same? There is a legal definition of "fair use" and a single screenshot does not violate the fair use in the article about the film. --Altenmann >talk 23:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.