Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 April 20

April 20

File:Screenshot 2025-04-18 182807.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2025 April 28. ✗plicit 00:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot 2025-04-18 182807.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Registration/Login page screenshots

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are these files really needed on their respective pages? Seems to be brushing WP:NFCC8. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 08:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems these screenshots have been selected because the homepages (which is what articles about websites normally screenshot) to avoid including pornographic and/or copyrighted images. YouTube gets around the latter problem by showing only cc-licensed videos, of the other articles in Category:Advertising video on demand only Plex has a screenshots (Plex for Web interface.png which should be looked at by someone more familiar with copyright/fair use than me. Given this precedent it seems that general consensus is that screenshots are not essential and I agree with the nominator that these do not significantly add to their aritcles. Thryduulf (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of these are encyclopedic. Given their utilitarian nature, I have serious doubts as to whether they could be considered copyrightable...if they are somehow, they are all violating each other's copyrights as well as any other login/registration pages. Buffs (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Electronic Intifada logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:18, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is too simple to be eligible for copyright in the US. I've now uploaded an SVG at Commons here: c:File:Logo of The Electronic Intifada.svg ―Howard • 🌽³³ 11:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redirect to commons. Clearly PD. Buffs (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cornelius Henderson state historic marker.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 21:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per c:COM:FOP US, freedom of panorama only extends to buildings. There is no evidence to suggest that the text, which is dated 2023, is freely licensed. As c:COM:CB#Noticeboards and signs states, "detailed informational and educational noticeboards/signs [...] are almost always copyright-protected". ✗plicit 11:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyrighted: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2001-2002/billanalysis/House/htm/2001-HLA-5889-a.htm. Buffs (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Henry Delacombe Roome.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no action. File was not properly tagged for discussion. ✗plicit 00:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a larger and clearer picture to Commons with the same name. Tagging Felix QW. Marnanel (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you post the link? Buffs (talk) 16:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect ONLY once the specific link is published. Buffs (talk) 16:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move and optionally copy to Commons, without deleting since the uploader marked it as {{Keep local}}. c:File:Henry Delacombe Roome.jpg is not the same image as File:Henry Delacombe Roome.jpg. hinnk (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rugby India.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Double with File:Rugby India.png. Looks to bite with the rules for non-free files. The Banner talk 21:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete whichever one is the unneeded one. Buffs (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the SVG unless someone can recode the raster graphic embedded in it. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.