Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 March 26

March 26

File:AS Roma - Luciano Spinosi, Luciano Moggi and Roberto Pruzzo.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. asilvering (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-Italy}} requires photographs to have been created prior to 1976 to be in the public domain in the United States, but this is dated as being taken in 1978. As such, this photo had its copyright restored per c:COM:URAA and is non-free in the U.S. That's makes this a non-free file, but it would not qualify for fair use for violating both WP:NFCC#1 and 8. ✗plicit 00:45, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is {{Not-PD-US-Subsist}} and its usage doesn't meet the NFCC. All of the other images in the Luciano Moggi article have the same issue. hinnk (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bill Withers - Live at Carnegie Hall.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. This is not an issue for FFD. Feel free to move to Commons. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:27, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This album cover was originally published in the US without an attached copyright notice (source: eBay). It is thus in the public domain due to failing formalities and should be transferred to Commons as {{PD-US-no notice}}. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is not how we handle transfers to commons. See Wikipedia:Moving files to Commons. You should replace the copyright tag with that yourself, replace the fair use with a simple information, and then select "Export to commons" and export it to commons this way. Once this is done, the file will be tagged for deletion automatically. You don't need to open a FfD for this.

I don't believe I can currently do this until this discussion is closed, so I'm commenting so that you can withdraw this and perform this action yourself, or someone is able to procedurally close this per the policy above.

That is, assuming the policy you've listed is accurate. I'm not a copyright expert here. Chew^{(V • T • E)} 20:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by 100jan0vski

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Likely web downloads; user has uploaded multiple copyvios marked "own work"; for many of the uploads, the user uploaded without a source, added URLs, then changed the owner to themselves after they were tagged "no permission". Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 19:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - uploader has a history of copyright violations both here and on Commons, and has pretty much admitted that these are not their own work on their talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)-[reply]

Delete all - No further explanation needed then what the previous user said. Боки 💬 📝 16:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - These files are web downloads (example: File:Stadion pod Bagdalom.jpg is this). The uploader has a history of copyright violations on en.WP and Commons. The uploader's account was partially blocked on March 26 for repeatedly uploading copyvio images. - tucoxn\^talk 11:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Per nomination as they are likely web downloads. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

1967–1970 Beatles album covers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 00:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These album covers were published in the United Kingdom without an attached copyright notice (sources: Discogs [for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band {the "notice" on the back cover appears to apply only to the lyrics}], Discogs [for Yellow Submarine], Discogs [for Abbey Road], Discogs [for Let It Be]) and were published in the United States within thirty days. Per c:COM:HIRTLE, they are thus in the public domain in the US due to failing formalities and should be relicensed as {{PD-US-no notice}} and {{Do not move to Commons|reason=US only|expiry=20XX}} (2038 for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, 2040 for Yellow Submarine and Abbey Road, and 2041 for Let It Be). JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UK works do not need a copyright notice for copyright to exist. It will exist regardless of the presence or absence of a notice. This does not affect their status in the US as US law only requires that something is in copyright in its 'home' country, not that it carries a copyright notice for other countries (although obviously it needs the US side of the formalities to be completed in full). Long story short, these are very much IN copyright in the UK and the US and need no relicensing. - SchroCat (talk) 09:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.