http://es.wikipedia.org You can put it up the same way you would with the English Wikipedia. For instructions on that see, Wikipedia:Starting a new page. Dismas|(talk) 22:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Im looking for a imformation on a certain wine. Its called Roux Pere & Fils, Rully, Bourgogne, France?
- This is a forum for help on using Wikipedia, not a general forum for discussion of random issues. I would use the Search tool (by default on the left of the page) to see if you can find any information on the topics of Rully, Bourgogne, Roux, Pere, or Fils, independently, and search for "French wines" if that fails. Good luck. --Edwin Herdman 22:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You could try a google search like this one: google:Example+subject+site:en.wikipedia.org *Cremepuff222* 23:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A Google Search on the World Wide Web finds some hits. Try this: Google:Roux Pere & Fils, or this: Google:Roux Pere et Fils. --Teratornis 18:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My article on CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) was deleted by an administrator called Finngall. The reason was "blatant advertising". The fact is CLIL is a methodological approach to the simultaneous learning of content and language. It is a priority in the Educational policy of the European Commission, and the European Centre of Modern Languages, depending on the Council of Europe, has made of it one of the strands for its medium and long-term projects call for proposals. Everything I wrote in the article was documented with the appropriated bibliography, part of which were publications supported by EU funded projects, such as Leonardo da Vinci, Comenius, etc. If the fact of talking about the advantages of implementing this methodology in European schools was what made the administrator suspicious, I would like to say that it was a summary of a research article called Think Tank 2006, carried out on occasion of the CLIL Conference in Helsinki in June 2006. The research was carried out on behalf of CIMO (Finland) and supported by a EU funded Leonardo da Vinci project called CLILCOM. I'm a novice in Wikipedia, so I don't really know if this is the right place to explain the reason why I'm asking for the restoration of the article, but please take into consideration my explanation and restore it, since it doesn't have to do with advertising, but with the results of academical research on the matter. Thank you in advance. Mjfrigols —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjfrigols (talk • contribs)
- The administrator who deleted your article was Fang Aili. You need to start by discussing the issue with her on her talk page. If you cannot find resolution through that discussion, the next step would be Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~ BigrTex 23:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Finngall was the editor who proposed it for speedy deletion and used Template:Spam-warn on your talk page.[5] I haven't see the article but template messages have a standard text and may not fit a given page exactly. As BigrTex says, it was deleted by Fang Aili.[6] PrimeHunter 23:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See Why was my article deleted?. And in the meantime, while you are trying to figure out why your article was deleted from Wikipedia, you should look for another wiki more welcoming to your content, and try developing your article there. (One problem with these questions about deleted articles is that many Help desk volunteers are not Wikipedia administrators and thus we lack the ability to see deleted articles, so we cannot review the articles and tell how to edit them to comply with Wikipedia's policies.) If you develop your article on another wiki, then you can come back here and give us a link to it, so we can review it and tell you what it needs to be suitable for Wikipedia. Without actually seeing your article, I can only speculate as to the problem, but if you are personally (emotionally) invested in the topic you wrote about, you may have succumbed to the temptation to use promotional language rather than the appropriately detached encyclopedic tone. Again, I emphasize I am only guessing, but that is one possible explanation for the "blatant advertising" label applied by the other editor. In any case, since you are obviously new to Wikipedia, you haven't learned to navigate Wikipedia's incredibly complex policies and guidelines which tend to eat new users for lunch, so there are any number of editing faux pas you may have unwittingly committed (although strictly speaking, these would not be faux pas because the rules are in fact pretty thoroughly written; the problem for new users is finding and reading all the manuals that apply to what they want to do).
- Speaking of which, since you seemed to be involved in research about education, perhaps you would be interested in researching methods to train new Wikipedia users more efficiently than the current "method" - which evidently fell short for you. Currently, there is not much of a method for training new users; anybody can click an edit link and type whatever they want; in a disturbingly large percentage of cases, edits by new users get deleted.
- To find a suitable wiki for your article, see the List of wikis, and search WikiIndex. For example, I see an Education wiki on Wikia, and a whole category full of education-related wikis. In general, wikis that specialize in a particular topic area are not as persnickety about on-topic articles as Wikipedia is. Unlike many new users seem to expect, Wikipedia actually wants only a relatively small (but still absolutely large) subset of human knowledge. See: WP:NOT.
- Also note that Wikipedians are diverse, with some leaning more toward Deletionism and others toward Inclusionism. That is, some Wikipedians tend to delete articles that have problems, while others try to fix the problems and keep the articles if possible. A new user typically lacks the understanding of Wikipedia policies as necessary to placate the deletionists, or knowledge of how to find inclusionists who could help repair the problems in an article. --Teratornis 15:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I am working on having the fonts of as many languages as possible, but even though I downloaded the "Official Cherokee Font" from the Cherokee Nation web site, the Cherokee Wikipedia is still all question marks. Which font do you guys use? Thank you!
Cole Moldy
- Hey there. My first guess is that your browser hasn't selected the correct encoding.
- In Internet Explorer: View -> Encoding -> Unicode (or some such)
- In Firefox: View -> Character Encoding. Let me know if that helps. --Edwin Herdman 23:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm afraid to say this, but I think the font is "Trebuchet MS". *Cremepuff222* 23:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cherokee uses its own alphabet. "Trebuchet MS" should render the English text (including the instructions on the Unicode help page) correctly, but you will still have to find an appropriate font. I believe Cole has done so, but the browser hasn't selected the appropriate encoding. --Edwin Herdman 00:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I need sulfur for jordan
- Please remember that the help desk is for questions regarding the use of Wikipedia; for other questions, see the reference desk. If you want to find the sulphur article, it's at sulphur. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks! *Cremepuff222* 00:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How do I create a new article? When I search the name, other articles come up, leaving me clueless as to how to start a new one.
- Well, if other articles appear when you search for an article, doesn't that mean that the article's arleady been created? :) See Wikipedia:Starting a new page, and make sure the subject is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. *Cremepuff222* 23:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the poster means that they type what name they want for the article into the search box, which brings up a search rather than any way to create an article. One little hint is this - instead of pressing enter in the search box, click the "Go" button. That still brings up the search, but it includes a header with a link allowing you to create the page, for example Red link (don't create this page, of course). Confusing Manifestation 00:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]