The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.
September 17
The Fuh
Hey why did you delete my page about the Fuh calling it nonsense? I know a lot of people who believe in that.
Image Problem
Can't someone just purge the whole cache on the image server ? I don't believe every user has to go in and purge every image individually ! 195.137.93.171 00:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just be patient. It's being worked on and purging the entire cache would probably bring the servers to a crawl. Just save your desired edits until things get caught up. -- Kesh01:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK - it seems really odd that Special:Newimages has cache problems. I wonder if it would help to put a purge button on the Images page template ? Maybe only display it if you can detect a problem occurred ? I wonder if it would be possible to query for problem images.
To clarify why the first one didn't work, the {{#if: {{{n|}}}... is asking "If a parameter called n exists, then...", but {{xxx|n}} is saying "Please use Template:xxx and assign a parameter called "1" the value "n". Using the original posters original syntax intent, he wanted {{#if: {{{1|}}}... (in which case anything after the pipe would generate the zzzz output) — TimotabTimothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)17:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Linking username to email address, in case username is forgotten
Hi,
I believe I have previously registered as a Wiki user, however, as it was some time back, I have forgotten my username. I tried to find my username details, however, the login process sends an email (with new password) to the specified 'username' email address. 203.24.6.121 01:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Is it not possible to link the login process with the email address to make the username discoverable, so that, if someone has forgotten their username, they won't go about trying usernames, and resetting other people's passwords?[reply]
My other alternative would be to create a new user, however, this was just a thought for those with existing user accounts (that know about them). :D
The user has forgotten the user name. Mail new password works by first selecting the user name so it cannot be used here. The old password continues to work until the new is entered, so users will not get problems if somebody else requests a new password for them by mail. Your email address cannot be used to find your user name. If you remember pages you have edited while logged in at the account then you may be able to find your user name by clicking the history tab at those pages. If you know a possible start of the user name then you can try findining it at Special:Listusers. If you don't find it then create a new account. PrimeHunter01:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I assume you mean the autocompletes in the search box. Open up the list and put your mouse on the first entry. Then hold down delete for Internet Explorer, or shift-delete for Mozilla Firefox. I believe Opera uses delete. The entries will then whizz away. This applies to any text box that has autocompleted values, such as the Google search box. x42bn6TalkMess04:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Law info-box?
Hello there. Is there any kind of info-box for articles about laws or legislation? I only seem to be able to find them for Law Schools and the like. Thanks --TreeKittens05:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Thw1309. I'm still a bit confused however. I'm looking for an info-box suitable for particular laws, rather than general categories and classes of law such as Contract Law. In particular I'm looking for a Federal or Public Law infobox suitable for the PETS Act article and others. Thanks --TreeKittens17:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
how to hide your username in the page history
how do I create new pages without showing my user name. I don't want people to know I am writing about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woomou (talk • contribs) 06:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The whole history system is in place to keep people accountable. If you don't want to take credit for something you wrote, it's probably because said material is not acceptable. - 131.211.210.17 09:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK. But what if I do not want to show my Username, and instead want to display my nickname in the history pages, as it comes in the comments. Bhuto (Talk | Contribs) 10:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Legal case results citation
I'm came across the article for Colleen Shannon which says that she was involved in a legal battle over her high school yearbook photo when it got published in Playboy. I've been able to find a lot of links to articles about the case written before the decision of the court was made but not one link explaining how the case was settled. Does anyone know how I might find such info? Dismas|(talk)06:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. I was on the fence as to whether I should bring my question here or the Ref Desk. I thought since it had to do with an article, I'd bring it here. I guess I was wrong. Dismas|(talk)08:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Help Desk is more for understanding the nitty-gritty of working on Wikipedia. Factual information, whether related to an article or not, is what you head to the Reference Desk for. Good luck finding that info! Confusing Manifestation12:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Links inside brackets
How do I create a link inside a bracket?
Looks silly: In a now famous passage in the Reflections, Burke lamented: "I had thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from the scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her [Marie Antoinette] with insult. – But the age of chivalry is gone."
Doesn't have link: In a now famous passage in the Reflections, Burke lamented: "I had thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from the scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her [[[Marie Antoinette]]] with insult. – But the age of chivalry is gone."
Hi there, I have been having a problem for a while in which I cannot see some images on Wikipedia. At times I can click on the text that says it is a picture and the picture is fine but it doesn't show up in reduced and sometimes in full size. Here is an example Image on Wikimedia
This is a ongoing known problem stemming from some issue on Commons, the developers are aware of it, and is looking into it. KTC09:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
formations simliar to adams bridge all over the world
how many formations similiar to adams bridge exst in this world. I mean so linear and so long almost mimicing a man made bridge≈12:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)12:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)~~partharjun_2000
In Corinthians 6:9 the bible names things that will keep you from getting to heave,such as the effeminate,just exactly what is effeminate refering to and does the bible say that a homosexual can not enter the kindom of God? send answer to <email address removed> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.68.248.214 (talk) 12:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean Homosexuality and Islam, then there isn't a "publisher" in the traditional sense. If you scroll to the top of the article and click on the "History" tab, it will show you who has contributed to the article (and even see what their contributions were), and if you're planning to cite it in a paper of some sort, there's a "Cite this article" link on the left-hand side of the page. However, see Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia for some caveats and other stuff. Confusing Manifestation12:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warning template?
I'm looking for a template that thanks the user for editing Wikipedia and thanks him for reverting his own edits. I've seen such a message on some users' talk pages, but I can't find a template that does exactly that. There are templates that thank them and warn them but the ones I find imply that someone else reverted their edits. When a user experiments, then goes back and reverts his own changes the wording should be different. Sbowers312:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There were some fixes to help image display in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 (and 5.5) added recently, but specifically for those two browsers, they seem to have caused the toolbar buttons not to work. It's a known problem; in the meantime, you can work around the problem by using a different browser (either by upgrading to Internet Explorer 7, or by using a different browser altogether). --ais523 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Macro environmental factors affect organization’s marketing efforts. Discuss each of the macro environmental factors in detail with relevant real life examples that should include local and multinational companies operating in Malaysia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.204.189 (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a test you're giving us? This page is for help with using Wikipedia, not answering essay questions. The reference desk is for factual questions, but you should do your own homework.LeeboT/C16:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
English wikipedia and MS Windows Vista Home Premium - pages garbled upon refresh or revisit
I recently bought a machine with this newer OS. Wikipedia pages (English and French, all I tested) now show consistent display problems with both IE7 and Firefox browsers. The symptom is:
The first time a page is displayed it works fine. Upon subsequent display (even after restarting the browser) the page is garbled, as if I had opened a binary in a text editor. Flushing caches and temporary files had no effect, and I couldn't find any record of problems like this in a search.
I cannot find specific information on How To Post An Article
Wikipedia Community
I have spent many hours this morning trying to figure out how to post an article. I have searched the site and only been able to discover "editing", not posting. Clearly I am missing something, and no one has been able to point me in the right direction.
Can someone inform? Thanks
Robert Allen 14:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't already, read the Introduction and Tutorial. Then Wikipedia:Your first article is a good guide to what you should, and shouldn't, place in the article; and Help:Creating a new page gives information on how to create one. (To create an article, you simply edit a nonexistent article; the editing causes it to exist.) --ais523 14:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure exactly how the bot works, but do you have an account? You're not logged in now. It looksl like you'd probably have to change the "My_user_name" part to your username, whatever it is. LeeboT/C16:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry I didnt explain myself very well, it looks very good here
akpeokkoerk;aeo
afdadlakjdfl;jdsjlsajlfjaljlfjlasj
akjdfkjsajdfjsdllkjd
akjdfkjsajdfjsdllkjd
akjdfkjsajdfjsdllkjd
adkfj;sjaldjaslj
aksdfsd;flldska
akldkfkas;f;lk;sd
File:Leebo.PNG
aldsaddakskdfls
"biosolids" - sewage sludge
I would like to add a comment to the "biosolids" page . . . see following . . .
September 17, 2007 "Biosolids" is generic
About 15 years ago in an effort to deceive the public as to the true content of treated municipal sewage sludge (the landspreading of which is "regulated" at 40 CFR Part 503), the waste industry and EPA changed the name to "biosolids". However, so many camels have gotten their noses under the "biosolids" tent, that the word is no longer specific to human sewerage, and is now used for a number of other waste products. (Just check Google to confirm):
Cornell (University) Waste Management Institute correctly refers to this toxic/pathogenic waste as "sewage biosolids". The federal Clean Water Act defines sewage sludge as a "pollutant".
Personally, I think an EPA Administrator got it right, when he said on October 21, 2001: "My personal view is, I don't think we should be using euphemisms," said Alan Hais, the EPA's program manager for sludge regulations. (Mr. Hais is now an employee of Water Environment Federation, the lobbying and PR arm of the sludge industry.)
a recent update to the section "mothers" has taken me personally to distress. i strongly wish to have it removed. This section i talk about is about my mother which is untrue and i wish for it to be dealt with immediatly. how do i go about reporting this and getting it removed?
After reverting did you add a warning to the vandal's talk page and/or notify WP:AIV? (I am asking not so much as a comment to you but to all readers of this page.) Sbowers317:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't do any good to notify WP:AIV if it's the first warning on the vandal's Talk page, or the first warning in several weeks. Admins will remove the AIV entry because the vandal has not had a sufficient number of warnings. Warning tags need to escalate, starting with, for example, {{uw-v1}} and escalating through {{uw-v4}}. Corvus cornix17:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Migraine" page isn't working. It just says "Wikipedia is sustained by people like you. Please donate today." Nothing else is listed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.129.203.101 (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Im formatting a book on wikisource, and i want to create a custom table of contents--basically, a TOC-like box (collapsible, same BGcolor) that's totally blank, that i can fill with my own custom pagelinks. could somebody point me to where i might find the appropriate code, or at least something thats easily modifiable? --PopeFauveXXIII08:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I found those already... i think theyre a little too different from the standard TOC to be of use to me. they'll come in handy for the background color, but im having more trouble figuring out how to collapse the box than anything else. I cant believe a blank TOC template doesnt exist, honestly! Im moving this question to the bottom in hopes of getting a few more suggestions, 'cause i guess i need to build one. --PopeFauveXXIII20:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Banana storage
I have had many years researching banana storage and have found very little relevant inforamation under this heading.I found the heading is partialy protected. Have searched FAQCan you please a first time user how to add my information. Kevin Joseph Scott 101Kevin Joseph Scott 101 20:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The page has indeed been semi-protected, which disables editing from anonymous users and registered accounts less than four days old. It looks like your account was only created today, so hang around for four days and then you can edit it. Or, if you like, you can swing over to my talk page and tell me the information that you'd like to add, and I can do it for you. GlassCobra20:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Renaming pages
I edited the article on Clan Donald changing the names of the branches. Each branch was erroniously titled "Clan MacDonald of Antrim" etc. They should be titled "MacDonald of Antrim" etc. But the branch names were linked to articles about those branches and I cannot figure out how to rename the Wikipedia pages for those Clan Donald branches so they will stll be linked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmcdonald49 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. :) Renaming pages is explained at Help:Moving a page. This will create a redirect at the old title so that users can still find it. However, note that it's usually good policy to discuss a rename at the talk page of the article if you believe it may be controversial. :) (Oh, and let me add that you must be registered for more than four days to do this. Alternatively, you may request assistance at Wikipedia:Requested moves.) --Moonriddengirl21:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Posting new article
Hello, I logged in and posted a new article but it has not appeared. I haven't received an email saying it was approved either. The FAQ wasn't helpful in telling me what to do, as far as I can tell. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi. I see that you posted in the Introduction on September 7th something about "Body1, Inc" and attempted to see if that had been the title of your article, but I don't see any evidence of such in a deletion log. Nor do I see anything about Body1.net or simply Body1. It's possible that your article was speedily deleted for failing to meet one of Wikipedia's essential guidelines for article inclusion. Usually, an editor will be notified on his or her talk page if this is the case, but not always. If you remember the title, you can find the steps for determining what happened at "Why was my page deleted?" If there isn't any record of it, I would wonder if something went wrong in the creation process. Particularly when creating complex articles, I like to keep a version outside of Wikipedia just in case of computer error (or, as is all too often the case with me, "computer user error"). Good luck tracking it down, and if you can't figure out, we may be able to help more with more detail. :)--Moonriddengirl22:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I checked if Emoore5186 had any deleted contributions and there were none. Erin, as Moonriddengirl described, you added a section to a sandbox, which is regularly flushed out and is only for experimentation edits. If you want the article to be added to the encyclopedia, it must be created at Body1. LeeboT/C22:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's apparently "Body 1" with a space. Body 1 was deleted as spam in 2005 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Body 1. I haven't seen the article but the AfD mentions Body1.com which is one of many Body 1 websites. A new article may also be deleted as recreation of deleted material (depending on how closely it resembles the deleted article which I haven't seen), or as spam or non-notable content. Your edit appears to break several of our policies and guidelines. If you are affiliated with Body 1 then see Wikipedia:Business FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. PrimeHunter23:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
signing in
I created an acct.successfully,confirmed my email etc..however AIM will not allow me to sign in,it consistantly tells me that my username or password is incorrect-I have checked it 5 tim es and it still wont sign in!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myob25 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]