http://en.m.wikipedia.org/ has a "Random" button near the top. Is this not shown on mobile devices? You can enter special:random
in the search box but this requries more wrrk. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I worked on creating the Wilson desk article, which has made it to DYK today, but I have just realized that DYK fact may be inaccurate. A user with out a username (it was 209.137.134.61) pointed out that the dates of when the desk was in use do not include the time that Henry Wilson was Vice President. Now every reliable source I could find stated that the desk was used by Henry Wilson and Nixon mistakenly thought it was used by Woodrow Wilson. After more investigating I found here [3] that the desk was purchased by Garret Augustus Hobart, who was a Vice President after Henry Wilson died in office. Does this mean that all of the sources are incorrect? Is this me coming to conclusions that reliable sources do not state or synthesizing sources in a way that is not supposed to be done on wiki? Should I ask for the fact to be removed from DYK? How do i fix the article if every source says someone used the desk that there is no way they could have? Any help would be amazing.--Found5dollar (talk) 15:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I followed all the instructions to upload an image, and it uploaded successfully. I would now like to embed the image in the astrobiology article that I have been contributing to, and I used the same format as you describe above: "\[\[File:Example.png|thumb|Caption text]]" but this did not work. I also modified the format to match some of the other images in the article, trying lines such as "\[\[Image:Example.png|thumb|right|Caption text]]" but this did not work either. Do I not yet have the proper status to embed pictures yet? I am presently a member of the group "Users". Do I need to post more to attain a higher rank in order to embed images?
Thanks in Advance, Dieter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dieter1234 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
How do I change the User: title that appears at the top of the article? It automatically uses by user name instead of the article name. Thanks for your help. Elearning201 (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Help, I wrote a short article some time ago and am unable to work out how to upload it.
You can see the article on my page, username: michaelgphillips
Thanks
Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelgphillips (talk • contribs) 20:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Coastal Living Magazine is not on this list. It is published in the US and is an excellent source for coastal life fans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.85.214 (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
What is the edit tool that will clean up a References section by taking multiple citations from a single source and lumping them together as one entry under References (with the little carrot thingy)? I was wondering if I could find it and use it on an article. Any tutorials on Wikipedia for using editing tools would also be a help. Thank you!! OttawaAC (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can someone tell me why there is a cite error even though I have a {{reflist}} Effeminacy#See_also CTJF83 22:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
A page that is of interst to me has been notified it is not meeting notibilty requirments. We are not really able to understand or facilitate these modifications. Do you staff or volunteers who can help me meet the needed requirements?
thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pms166 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
What is the preferred way to cite a pamphlet like source? This pamphlet was distributed together with a larger book. Is there a specific template for such a case? Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
An issue was raised few days back Regarding the Reliability of the source http://www.pakdef.info/mission.html on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Pakdef.info . the issue only had comments from the involved editors (with 1 single comment from a neutral editor), the issue is not yet resolved and i feel soon this will be archived bu the bot due to delay. The issue is important as the claims of the source are unreferenced and questionable and its use on wiki article will lead to several disputes, and questions on reliability. Is there a way to get mediation on this (i am asking this here as on of the editor in the discussion wrongly infers it is resolved and is wrongly accusing me of wp:canvassing and wp:forum shop) . My intention is to get the issue resolved to its logical conclusion, suggestions welcome. --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 22:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)