http://en.m.wikipedia.org, which rendered in the "new look," and from which i went to the sample article linked above, but that was an internal link rather than http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesaropapism. But what is up with that? Thanks Grace and peace thru the Lord Jesus (talk) 15:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
If I create a page within Wikipedia and then want to know how many page hits, is there a way within Wikipedia to do that? If not what are other options: a counter, Google Analytics etc? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.12.62.92 (talk) 15:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia, Sorry. I seem to have irritated you. I apologise. I am not very confident with IT and working online. To those who are, it is probably a mystery that others can be so inept. I think I have written a good article, but panicked when it appeared online a couple of times with my name in the title, and when I hadn’t cited it. Again sorry. I am still a little confused, but will try harder! All the best,
86.143.16.133 (talk) 16:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
What is the "RELATED CHANGES" in left box? Irontaker (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Adenhart&action=history
What's actually sock meant in terminology of wikikpedia? somebody called me that over there. Irontaker (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I reported User:Breivik knows best; death 2 Arabs! at WP:UAA, but the bot removed it ("Blocked by..."), even though the user's block log is empty. What happened? 2001:18E8:2:1020:14CA:926D:7D1C:85A5 (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to ask around if anyone could me improve the layout of the Liverpool Pride article. As you can see, I've put some detailed info up on artists and acts that performed at previous Liverpool Pride festivals, but the layout does not look symmetrical or pleasing to the eye, could anyone help me to improve? Thanks. Richie wright1980 (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)