https://en.wikipedia.org. We are not affiliated with wikiHow, one of thousands of unrelated wikis. A wiki is just a type of website. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
how to create articles on wikipedia's — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirpatel331 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Amirpatel331, see Wp:FIRST for advice on your first article, and either WP:TUTORIAL or WP:ADVENTURE for general editing tips. GirthSummit (blether) 14:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Would the maps on this site (https://fall.fsulawrc.com/collection/LimitsinSeas/numericalibs.html) be free to use on Wikipedia under the 'fair use' rule? Sdrawkcab (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sdrawkcab: Looks like those documents are created by the US Government, so copyright does not apply. RudolfRed (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- ok, thanks! Sdrawkcab (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not convinced that is true for all of them, RudolfRed. The PDFs that I have looked at (which don't contain maps) say they were prepared by the "Office of the Geographer, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Department of State", but many of the maps themselves do not appear to have an origin noted. Most of them have a consistent presentation, which probably is from the Office of the Geographer, but some are in entirely different style, and are most unlikely to originate with the US Government (see in particular the Libya/Algeria maps). I suspect that they are all in the public domain, those ones by reason of age; but I think it would be important to investigate further, Sdrawkcab, and check that the ones you want to use are indeed Public domain.
- If they are not, then you may be able to follow your original plan and use them as non-free; but Wikipedia's rules for this are more restrictive than general "fair use" rules: you would need to show that the use met all the terms in the non-free content criteria. --ColinFine (talk) 23:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- ok I’ll take a look thanks Sdrawkcab (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The Libya/Algeria maps that ColinFine mentions are discussed in the associated document and attributed to the Institut géographique national (Maps 1, 2 and 3) and the Service Géographique de l'Armée (Geographic Service of the Army, Maps 4 and 5; this attribution is also made in each image in the caption on the left). Per commons:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France, French government works are not in the public domain, but copyright expires 70 years after publication. So Maps 4 and 5, dated 1936, would seem to be out of copyright, but maps 1 and 2, dated 1956, would not be for another seven years. (I know these points are tangential to the question posed, but the maps and their provenance are interesting, and it would be nice to be able to have some or all of them on Commons.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is too much information about my personal profile. Request the page be deleted. Thank you, Samuel P. De Bow, Jr.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_P._De_Bow_Jr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B022:C596:654F:3224:E4B6:F0E9 (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Samuel P. De Bow Jr. cites no sources, and much of it is copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20070507031733/http://www.omao.noaa.gov/biodebow.html (though as the original of that site is controlled by the US government there may be no copyvio involved). Maproom (talk) 18:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In a Wikitable, is there a way to combine "colspan" and "rowspan" on the same cell entry?
Let's say that I want the cell entry to span across 3 columns (horizontally) and also across 5 rows (vertically).
I tried all of the following ... nothing seemed to work.
| colspan="3" rowspan="5" | My text. ( I placed no punctuation between the colspan and the rowspan elements. )
| colspan="3" | rowspan="5" | My text. ( I placed the punctuation of the vertical bar between the colspan and the rowspan elements. )
| colspan="3" ! rowspan="5" | My text. ( I placed the punctuation of the exclamation point between the colspan and the rowspan elements. )
Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Try this Help:Table#Combined_use_of_COLSPAN_and_ROWSPAN - X201 (talk) 21:05, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The first code is correct, e.g. in this table:
- If you want to know what is wrong with an edit then link the actual edit or post the whole code. I couldn't find it in your recent contributions. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @PrimeHunter: Thanks. I will provide the link to the actual edit. I can't do so, at the moment. But, I will do so soon. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @PrimeHunter: OK. Here it is. Please see this page: User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page126. The top chart is "before modification"; the second chart is "after modification" (whatever modifications you add). I want the very final, bottom row to have a "rowspan" of 2 ... so that it is twice as high (twice as tall). Also, I just noticed that the "sorting" capability is not working correctly. Do you know why that is? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 14:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- If I understand it correctly, putting rowspan=2 in the last row of the table won't do anything. What rowspan=2 will do is combine the cell in which it is placed with the corresponding cell in the following row. If there is no following row there will be no effect. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @PrimeHunter: and @David Biddulph: Great ... thanks! Also, I just noticed that the "sorting" capability is not working correctly. Do you know why that is? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Please say what you mean by something not working, i.e. in what way it doesn't behave as you expect. If you mean sortbottom wasn't working in one of the rows then it was placed wrong.[1] A table row only has one line starting with "|-". Earlier lines are ignored. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @PrimeHunter: Yes, that was exactly the "issue" ... about the "sortbottom" not seeming to work properly. (Which you fixed.) Thanks for all the help! Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 21:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]