Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Iglu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Iglu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A half-dozen reviews in the last half-year alone suggests there's either a clear campaign for advertising only, or there's no sufficient substance for notability itself, both of which are enough for deletion, since they're satisfactory in our policies; all sources offered and the changes suggested are unconvincing because they're company-sourced or company-PR, unacceptable in our simplest of standards. SwisterTwister talk 20:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. rejected six times without improvement. Still unlikely to pass afd. DGG ( talk ) 09:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.