Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Miniminter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Miniminter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Since the October 2020 decline this draft was resubmitted four times without any significant improvement, two of which were after the rejection notice was placed. Time to put this to bed. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and I should remember to watchlist these drafts. SK2242 (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and ECP Salt in draft space - This was resubmitted twice after rejection, which is only visible in the history because the reviewer reverted the resubmissions. Resubmission after rejection (without discussion) is tendentious and calls for either MFD or some other sanction. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Miniminter is already salted in article space, and should be left salted. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See also the talk page, where I added some background information a while ago. There is a complete lack of good faith here. MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt per nom. Undecided on whether full or ECP salting is justified. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete draft but make Miniminter into a redirect to Sidemen (YouTube group): The draft itself has indeed failed to prove the person's notability for his own individual Wikipedia article and it's unlikely, short of an immediate major overhaul by the draft maker, that this situation will improve on short notice. However, his group, the Sidemen, has been proven to be notable in of itself and his online name should be at least used as a redirect to that article, not indefinitely salted. That being said, should a redirect be made from Miniminter, said redirect should be locked immediately after creation to prevent users from trying to sneakily convert it into his own proper article. –WPA (talk) 10:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional comment: I've noticed that his real name, Simon Minter, already exists as a redirect to his group. –WPA (talk) 10:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: My requested redirect has been created since my vote was made. –WPA (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to continual resubmission after rejection. — csc^-1 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the person who rejected the draft; no serious improvement since declination. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.