Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WMFH-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn , noting also that the draft has been redirected to the article it was duplicating. Primefac (talk) 11:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:WMFH-LP

~~Draft no longer needed as page has been created. Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Redirect to WMFH-LP as a duplicate draft. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 01:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Will someone please look at the history of the draft and the article? Why did the nominator copy the draft into article space rather than moving it? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Neutralhomer Is breaking required attribution. User:Neutralhomer should be warned against copy-pastes, and blocked if he continues doing it. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon and SmokeyJoe: Neutralhomer did nothing of the sort. Neutralhomer did not break attribution, because the two autoreviewers Dan arndt and TheBirdsShedTears both declined it (Dan twice). So, it was going nowhere in DRAFT. Neutralhomer disagreed, since there were multiple newspaper articles about the station. So, using easy to find FCC, REC, and the sources provided by the original author, Neutralhomer used an LPFM station page template of his own design. There wasn't a copy/paste. This was a completely new article. Even the history section was trimmed and neatened up a bit. Neutralhomer is tired of petty bullshit.

TL;DR? DRAFT wasn't going anywhere, nothing to attribute, only history section was moved (not copy/pasted) and edited, the rest was added via a template of my design. Mole Hill meet Mountain. Population = 3. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:21, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from being rude, User:Neutralhomer appears to be trying to destroy the history of the article by needlessly requesting that a draft be deleted in place of redirecting from draft space to article space. Either the nominator did know that that is the proper way to use draft space (regardless of the amount of rewriting), or the nominator didn't know that that is the proper way to use draft space. If the nominator did know, then they are acting as if they are hiding the history. If the nominator didn't know, then the nominator should have left the draft alone rather than ignorantly requesting its deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It only takes 2 moles to create a surplus of moles. Small mammals are prolific. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutralhomer nominated the page for deletion because it's no longer needed. There is no "destruction" going on (dramatic much?) and yes, this is a big cover up on the scale of Watergate! No one must know! Don't alert the media!!! /sarcasm Now then, population of Mole Hill meet Mountain has gone up....just I'm gonna let this DRAFT page rot for all eternity. Withdrawing.....Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Redirected. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The nominator has been cautioned on their talk page about civility, which is the fourth pillar of Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.