Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:DeletePage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: April Fools Day is Over * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:DeletePage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

That'll teach them deletionists! DrowssapSMM 00:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing actual admins deleting don't need to use the special page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then delete it. 132.234.228.225 (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with ip, delete as unnecessary, why do we have it anyways? Toadette ^{(April Fools Day!)} 05:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember correctly I opposed adding special page->action redirects as unnecessary way back in the day. Not that my opinion has any say in these technical matters. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep per WP:SKEEP#3: The nomination is completely erroneous. Deletionism has already won a long time ago and we are all deletionists now, except that some of us don't know it.—Alalch E. 14:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, let's not risk losing information

『π』BalaM314〘talk〙 15:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Deletions have never actually caused any information to be lost in over a decade. It still exists, and I can still see it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.