Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PrisonedMuffin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SNOW/NOTBURO reclose, this is clearly uncontroversial and the blanking has rendered the original rationale invalid. I can’t see any practical point in keeping this open. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PrisonedMuffin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

The sole content of the user page is

benis :DDDDDDD, which I would almost nominate for WP:G3 as vandalism if this were not a userpage. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also: wikt:benis and KYM. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. No reason to delete. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Would you see no reason to delete a user page that simply says "penis"? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Maybe just some. At least benis has an iota of cleverness. For the Userpage that says just “penis”, I would leave it as better than nothing for an introduction to the user.

  The user has many unreverted mainspace contributions. I’m not saying I’m impressed, but his juvenile penis joke of a Userpage is within reasonable leeway. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  For what it's worth, the page has since been blanked by the creator. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That was a good edit. It indicates he is maturing. I thanked him for that edit. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I closed this as no longer relevant post-blank but due to complaints I’ve re-opened it. There’s literally no reason to delete it now. Dronebogus (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is an author of a page blanking it not a reason for deletion? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 23:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. A user requesting deletion for their user page is reason for deletion. Lots of people have blank user pages. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Don't see any reason for the closure to be undone. It was nominated for a reason; that reason no longer applies; no other reason for deletion has been advanced. That's pretty typical NOTBURO keep territory. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Talk page request. Dronebogus (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I know. I think you did the right thing in reopening it after the objections (better to err on the side of caution), but I don't think the requests to reopen had merit. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I’m considering just reclosing it because there’s literally no objective reason to delete it anymore, with consensus from voters. this is an obvious case of WP:NOTBURO. Dronebogus (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.