Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Last topic pool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep

This page was accidentally listed in WP:AFD. The following is the reason given by User:Georgia guy: Delete. I see no reason for a nonsensical pool like this. Wikipedia being finished after a while is not something to be excited about, unlike the exciting time when Wikipedia reaches a million articles, as indicated by Wikipedia:Million pool. What is this supposed to mean?? Now relisting, no vote. King of Hearts | (talk) 23:42, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is a humorous parody of Wikipedia:Millionth topic pool, which is in turn a humorous parody of the half-serious Wikipedia:Million pool. There is room for a little bit of humor in Wikipedia. --TantalumTelluride 00:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tantalum Telluride.-gadfium 01:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The end kind of had me chuckling. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 02:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. There's too many of this kind of polls, and the humor in them gets boring after the third or so. >Radiant< 12:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Okay, can't resist - you win. >Radiant< 00:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Radiant is right, there are too many pools. But this is one of the better ones. --Mark J 21:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No problem with humor pools, or some of the others would have vanished already! --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It's pretty funny. --Optichan 14:22, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep per Optichan --Army1987 14:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I don't see a reason to delete. The bar for deletion is a lot higher outside of the main article namespace. --Cyde Weys 06:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.