Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Questia/Userbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 01:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Questia/Userbox

This userbox says that a user has access to Questia, but now that Questia is defunct this is obsolete as far as I can tell. Jackattack1597 (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — While it might be defunct, that doesn't mean people can't display it. Perhaps change the wording to past tense though. — csc^-1 00:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per arccosecant — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per CSC. Changing to past tense would've been much quicker than this route. –Davey2010^Talk 21:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and change to past tense. Nothing wrong with userboxes stating past actions. That said, I have nominated the user category this userbox populates for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 March 20#Category:Wikipedians who have access to Questia since user categories are subject to much higher standards than userboxes and the category now clearly fails those standards. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per precedent as with e.g. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User LyricWiki and accordingly adjust language to be past tense. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.