Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Orangemarlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Close in favor of clarifiation from the Arbitration Committee, who may take action with regard to this case and its associated subpages at their discretion. An MFD on this matter is both premature and beyond the purview of MFD. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 01:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This "case" does not reflect an enforceable decision by the Arbitration Committee, as only one arbitrator, FT2, has publicly endorsed the outcome, while another Arbitrator, Kirill Lokshin, asserts that the decision in this "case" has no force or effect:This issue has been the subject of further discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Orangemarlin and other matters. It appears that this "case" is a nullity, and should be deleted. John254 01:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Orangemarlin, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.