Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject English (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WP:SNOW applies here, also, unanimous.. — Cirt (talk) 07:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject English (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Project started in 2008 and it has only one member. Had previous deletion and it was kept as historical. No real discussions since the project died. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Tag as historical - as per the first MFD, and tag as {{inactive}} per WP:INACTIVEWP.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 20:35, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This isn't what {{historical}} is for, that's for proposals that fail, procedures that are long since deprecated, or major projects that over time morphed into other things (like if WP:BIO were to be declared dead, we wouldn't want to delete it). This project is rightly tagged as inactive (notwithstanding the earlier MfD) because it is inactive; it is not historical because nobody cares nor ever will care what it has on it at this point. In this state its only value to the greater project is that it could eventually be re-organized. The topic has great potential for a WikiProject; however, it would most likely be something a group would want to start from scratch. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 20:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Doug.'s clear explanation. This project was stillborn and there is nothing there worth saving. --Kleinzach 00:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per doug. No need to keep a project that never even started. Nothing historical. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per Doug. E♴(talk) 03:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Tagging as historical might be a bit much, since there's really nothing there worth preserving in my opinion. Nightw 05:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can see the potential, but there just isn't the activity. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Stillborn is an apt description. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Doug, unless someone wants to give this project a breath of life. Templates like Template:WPEnglish weren't completed or implemented. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - There isn't anything historical worth keeping here, and it never started at all, for the most part. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 22:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.