Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Trivia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. — mark ✎ 16:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to have been created by a single purpose account to protest the Trivia Cleanup Project, this project violates WP:POINT and is at cross purposes with WP:AVTRIV L0b0t 22:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is completely against Wikipedia's policy on trivia and, furthermore, currently only has one member; the project's creator. Essentially, this user got angry at the idea of the current Wikiproject dedicated to cutting down the amount of trivia so he made this. --The Way 22:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per my nomination. L0b0t 22:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. There actually was a user named Name? I thought that was just the filler for the template. If it is, then it has never had any members. Badbilltucker 22:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, User:Name hasn't made an edit since 2004, so someone else added them to this project. L0b0t 22:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - User:Name won't be able to make any more edits because they have been blocked indefinitely from October 2. --tgheretford (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While I'm sure that its possible for a spite-originating project to become useful, I don't believe this to be one of those times. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:AVTRIV. Jpeob 22:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Warring proposals are bad enough, but wars of Wikiprojects against guidelines? -Amarkov ^blah_edits 23:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL. -- Ned Scott 07:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good point Ned. Can we speedy this? L0b0t 14:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:AVTRIV. - Mailer Diablo 20:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:POINT violation - surely this is grounds for deletion?? --SunStar Net 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per WP:NOT and WP:AVTRIV. However, I'd let this one run its full course, so the degree of unacceptability of such a project can be recorded somewhere... Titoxd^(?!?) 02:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I have speedied this ridiculous page because it couldn't possibly be of any help in improving Wikipedia, which should be the goal of any WikiProject. — mark ✎ 16:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.