Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Shortcuts

User:The Seal F1

Hello. I would like to request this permission. I'm reviewing the Special:Recentchanges, & I often see articles protected by the pending changes protection. I've read the both necessary articles about this feature and am familiar with the most important policies, including WP:BLP, obviously. Besides, I got the rollback a couple of weeks ago, so I can use it if necessary. The Seal F1 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Wug·a·po·des 23:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Destinyokhiria

Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now. You have been editing actively for a little over a month, and the limited number of reverts don't have helpful edit summaries. I'd suggest doing a bit more recent changes patrolling to establish more of a track record of responding to vandalism and other content issues. — Wug·a·po·des 00:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chippla360

Holla, It’s been over a month since I last requested for Pending changes right, I’m sure I meet the requirements now, I actively patrol the recent changes feed and I want to help. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 21:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{not done}} I appreciate your recent changes patrolling, but I think you should still get more experience. Femke said last time that you need to give user talk warnings after reverting vandalism, and this still is not happening consistently. I also checked some of your reverts and I think you could use more experience. For example, you made this revert saying it's "spammy" but the real issue seems to be WP:BLP vandalism, not spam. — Wug·a·po·des 00:16, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wugapodes It’s been over a month, which is the requirements I met after my last decline, I had Minimal reverts as of then. I had to wait for a month. so I gained the experience already and I’m experienced, the checklist says there should be an explanation for reverting edits and I some warn editors also on there talk page , you can further check that, @User:The Seal F1 Has spent equal duration on the platform with me. Here Warning, I have others I’ve warned, I can’t possibly warn all the user I revert there edits on talk page, that should be very stressful. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 09:15, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chippla360:  Done You're right that you've improved a lot. I checked more of your reverts and they are generally good even if you could be more specific and consistent in your edit summaries and warnings. As a note, you should be warning everyone, especially IPs, and using warning templates like {{uw-vandalism1}} for even simple reverts of potential vandalism. It's helpful for admins and other editors keeping track of issues. You can do this automatically with Twinkle. That aside, I think you'll do a fine job reviewing pending changes. Thanks for following up. — Wug·a·po·des 01:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:SKAG123

I have been editing Wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 5,700 edits. I’ve also been reverting vandalism using twinkle for a while so I am familiar with the guidelines. SKAG123 (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Wug·a·po·des 00:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lionel Cristiano

Hello, my first request was not done a year ago, I am reapplying today. I have read the review guide. Sometimes I look at the pending changes but I cannot accept good edits. Leotalk 16:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done You only have 17 reverts since your unblock, and after the previous decline, I would want to see much more of a track record before granting. I suggest doing more recent changes patrolling and using appropriate edit summaries to build a stronger record and show you understand the policies well. — Wug·a·po·des 05:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yovt

Hello editors, I request permission to review pending changes to help out the community on pages needing the RPC verification; I want to verify good content on the platform and this is one part that I would really appreciate access to. I would be reviewing and approving edits per Wiki guidelines, and I have read all policies on vandalism, copyright, BLP, etc. thanks! 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 02:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Wug·a·po·des 05:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Như Gây Mê

Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki and here), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted Pending changes reviewer rights on enwiki to make it easier to anti-vandalism here (aside from rollback right). Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 10:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer&oldid=1290170867"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.