Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 December 4

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was the original title of an article that has recently been moved as a result of an AfD on it. It is a literal English translation of the subject's Russian name, and is virtually unused except by whoever created the article in the first place. The only reason I didn't tag it with an R3 template is to give that person enough time to track it down to its new location.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Keep. Plausible typo. Ruslik (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - looks like something created in error, and I can't see any potential as a search term. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Actually, it is a plausible typo, of a kind which I've done myself on occasions too numerous to count. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was N/A. Article was restored and subsequently sent to AFD. RFD is no longer applicable. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, doesn't seem a likely search term. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, this redirect was created on top of a prodded article, which has been contested, and undeleted (before I noticed this, oops). I'm going to rollback the adding of the redirect, therefore this discussion will either need to be closed, or should discuss the addition of a hatnote on the said article. I'm not familiar with these discussions, so I'm asking someone who is more knowledgable about these matters to come forward. Thanks, Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, that works. Didn't realize the history first. I don't think the article will survive, but let's give it time first. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect. The article about the trademarked Skyroof should be deleted, as the product is non-notable, and "skyroof" is used in casual speech as an alternative term for general sunroofs. The redirect to sunroof should be kept, as the two terms are sometimes confused. —Lowellian (reply) 20:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since someone removed the PROD, I've listed it on AFD now. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyroof. —Lowellian (reply) 20:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from template space to user space. The user in question was last active in January 2008, so they do not need it, and certainly no one else does. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. obvious delete. Totnesmartin (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Withdrawn. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Tiedemann Giese#Mauritius Ferber - one notable person redirect to a second notable person simply because they were both bishops of Warmia? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed as the redirect has been stubbed.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, according to Piotrus' previous edit, the Ferber article is not a stub. -- Matthead  Discuß   00:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.