Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 March 4

March 4

Guiness World Rec. issue 2002 p.156 → Arabic Legislations Encyclopedia

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#R3. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term ViperSnake151 20:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Super Karate Kids → Jack and Jill School

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 11:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was retargeted to The Karate Kid (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was retargeted to The Karate Kid (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was retargeted to The Karate Kid (non admin close) B.Wind (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Karate for High School → Castleson High

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Children Martial Arts → Jack and Jill School

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 11:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Children Karate → Jack and Jill School

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 11:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. This was probably thought of as search terms instead. Xeltran (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Bacolod Karate → Jack and Jill School

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is non-reflective of the article it redirects to. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_The_Hill_(JJS)_(2nd_nomination) for related discussion. Xeltran (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mengullo, Randy → Jack and Jill School

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure. §hawnpoo 23:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_March_1#Randy_Mengullo for ongoing discussion. An archived version for article deletion is also available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mengullo,_Randy. The result was delete thus this one is a recreated redirect. Xeltran (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

George J. Flanigen IV → Flanigen

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Why redirect an individual, non-notable Flanigen person to the article on Flanigen? Because until just now, the Flanigen article had coatrack information on George J. Flanigen IV. He is now mentinoned nowhere n the project and should therefore be deleted since he doesn't seem to be notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirps • HELP) 03:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is one mention of him at Dove Awards of 1989 but I don't object to deletion. Biscuittin (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely that mention is tied more closely to Deaton-Flanigen Productions, a company that has shot many music videos. They could probably stand to have an article but Flanigen himself doesn't. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirps • HELP) 19:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The result of the discussion was not applicable - nominated article is not a redirect. While there was a recent discussion (in WT:PROD) mentioning the possibility of expanding the scope of WP:RfD to cover dab pages, there has yet to be a change in policy to allow it. B.Wind (talk) 01:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Speaks for itself. The second definition is in-universe and not needed and the first definition is on Witch Hunter already. DragonZero (talk) 05:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 March 4, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.