Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 December 1

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was WP:CSD#G1, nonsense. ~Alison C. (Crazytales) 03:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Next great american city → West Palm Beach, Florida (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]
• The next great american city → West Palm Beach, Florida (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

These should either be deleted or retargetted somewhere, possibly Philadelphia. The term "next great American city" is not apparently used anywhere on Wikipedia, other than in these redirects, nor can I find any evidence that it's used in reference to Palm Beach, Florida. Creating these redirects back in 2006 are the creators only Wikipedia edits, so there is no clue to be gained from them (other than their creator is likely to be from Palm Beach). Google hits for the phrase though show a remarkable, although not universal, consistency in referring to Philadelphia (I wasn't expecting any consistency at all, there being lots of cities in America), although I've not investigated why this is. If the term were used on the Philadelphia article I'd probably have boldy retargetted there, but as it isn't I've brought them here for discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 01:40, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Never heard of the term, and if these are the only things created by the account, they seem pointless. --Axel™ (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete highly biased POV. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 06:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: no good way to use it. Speedy close? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Verges on vandalism. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.