Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 8

March 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 8, 2012

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, as the target has now been deleted as well. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ramna Sharma

Ramna Sharma → Avake Technology (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete: was promotional page, then redirected to promotional company page which has now been PRODded. Whouk (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Commonwealth Parliamentary Library

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Parliamentary Library → National Library of Australia (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete: The two libraries are not the same, nor are they in the same location. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the redirect is better as a redlink. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, misleading redirect. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as misleading. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Erev

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erev → Eruv (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete: Erev in Hebrew means evening, and Eruv is something else entirely -- the person who created this redirect apparently doesn't know Hebrew as well as one might expect of a person working with Hebrew words. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. This redirect has gotten a lot of hits last month, but since it is a factual error I assume that all of those people were not happy with the result. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as it is it doesn't make much sense. Furthermore, with its high hit count the fact that nobody stepped out to defend it seems to prove the Ajraddatz's rationale. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as confusing redirect.--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.