Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:The Name Of Your Template → Template:Atlantic Coast Conference marching band navbox (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Links to a random template. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and consider salting; or replace with an error. This looks to be a placeholder name used by some creation wizard used by the user that created the current target template. The history of the target also suggests that this method was used by the creator of template:Neuroepistemology who unintentionally overwrote the marching band template. Thryduulf (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt per Thryduulf.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by Athaenara. Thryduulf (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snatch Magnet i → Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snatch Magnet (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

I was not supposed to be here, typo has been fixed by move redirect has been fixed aswell Hybirdd (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Taged for speedy deletion: G6 and G7. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 04:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:On → Template:New unreviewed article (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This redirect misleads people. The creation edit summary reads "just so twinkle will still show the right one". However, the discussions at Template talk:New unreviewed article and at WT:TWINKLE cast doubt whether it has ever been used this way. The only known uses are a case where an editor changed an instance of {{As of}} to {{On}} hoping to improve prose, and one where a sock put the preposition "on" in curlies, possibly in jest. These demonstrate that this redirect can cause confusion and make work. It would be best deleted, since redirecting it elsewhere would leave it open to the same kinds of confusion -- "on" is just too common a word. --Stfg (talk) 14:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as having no purpose, no understandable target despite the target being a valid page, no obvious rationale as "on" anyway. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not used by Twinkle per this test in the AFC sandbox, and has no other valid purpose. jcgoble3 (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Basically a nonsense redirect, probably created as a result of some sort of misunderstanding. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unlikely synonym.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Go ahead and delete it. I honestly don't remember why I made that. Perhaps Twinkle was using it in some way at the time? Michaelm55 (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.