Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 September 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Square pizza → Detroit-style pizza (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Square pizza means pizza cut by grid lines, and contrasts with triangle pizza, which means pizza cut by radial lines. A better choice for this re-direct is a section in the pizza article (feel free to add one if there are none) that talks about square and triangle pizza. Georgia guy (talk) 00:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is not a common nomenclature for pizzas and only refers to its shape, which applies to its present target, also to Sicilian pizza, the Pizza in the US article, and this section or this section of the Pizza article. The term does not lend itself readily to dabbing since none of those articles or sections are titled "Square pizza". Too many possible targets for an ambiguous, unofficial term – D1, D2 & D8. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 17:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 13:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Chinx Drugz → French Montana (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

This redirects to French Montana. The two are not the same person, and French's article has no mention of this guy, so I think the redirect should be deleted. TCN7JM 01:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Chinx Drugz is mentioned in the article, you might want to read it again. Drugz is a member of the group Coke Boys with Montana, and is signed to Montana's Coke Boys Records record label. They also significantly collaborate together. STATic message me! 01:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay, he's mentioned now. I will withdraw this nomination. TCN7JM 01:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  He was mentioned in the lead before, but someone removed it. STATic message me! 02:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Yeah, but that was unreferenced. Thanks for adding the missing refs. TCN7JM 02:14, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• RED 3 (2014 film) → RED 2 (film) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

To my knowledge, there is no source that says this movie has ever been slated for a 2014 release. We only have the one saying a screenplay is in the works with no definite knowledge that it's going to happen. It's not likely anyone searching for this movie would have even a ballpark estimation of its release date, and I find it quite unlikely that it would be released in 2014. A redirect for this film, even without the year, makes no sense at this time. LazyBastardGuy 03:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The source given in the article here gives a production date "as early as January 2014". Sounds like a keeper to me. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 17:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL. Production year ≠ release year for certain. Even with that tentative production date movies can and very often do get delayed. For one example, REC 4: Apocalypse was originally intended for release this October, but production troubles have delayed it to the next one. LazyBastardGuy 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Good catch, STATic! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 18:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - There is already RED 3 (film) which redirects to the exact same place, so there is no need for this extra redirect, because there is no other film named RED 3 so the year is unnecessary. STATic message me! 17:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edited my rationale - my opinion did soften a little bit upon reading this, and I had thought about that before. RED 3 (film) is sufficient. Even if it weren't, I imagine whichever other RED 3 would be the one to carry the year, seeing as it probably wouldn't be the primary topic of the two. (To clarify, had I known about the other redirect I probably would have XFD'd it at the time as well, but having read this my mind has changed.) LazyBastardGuy 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Creator of redirect agrees with deletion. Rationale: release date is not confirmed. LazyBastardGuy 18:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.