Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine → Sinabawang gulay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Vegetable soups in Philippine cuisine → Sinabawang gulay  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Added with the relist. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined db-6 by @Spinningspark: based on the rationale that "Article was here for many years, external links may break and redirects are cheap."

1. The length of time an erroneous article stayed up is irrelevant.
2. External links breaking means they can be found faster so they can be fixed.
3. This title is NOT a valid redirect. The previous contents of the page (which was moved) refers to a single specific dish: sinabawang gulay, which I have fixed. This redirect, in contrast, seems to be referring to vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine in general (i.e. a list article). There are many different kinds of vegetable soups in the Philippines. This is merely one of them. Redirecting this title to one specific dish is incorrect. It would be like redirecting Cities of the United States to New York. OBSIDIAN†SOUL 12:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.; misleading. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 14:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Book (divination with) → Bibliomancy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Misplaced disambiguator makes this a very unlikely redirect. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A quick Google search finds this precise string being used by Oxford's Dictionary of English folklore. This book review picks up on the definition in question, as well. Note that the freely online content doesn't use the term bibliomancy; one might plausibly look for this definition here. One might turn it around, of course, but would it be "divination with a book", "divination with book", "divination with books", or something else? I know if I encountered this phrase in this dictionary and wanted to look it up here, I'd start by using the exact phrase. Nyttend (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Nyttend's findings, this is clearly a useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. @Ohmyfifthharmony: Please update the article with a mention of this birth name as you proposed. Deryck C. 19:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Choi Ji-su → Itzy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see any mention of Choi Ji-su in the target _signed, Rosguill ^talk 07:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• That is her birth name. Lia would have had to be used with some add on like (singer) so I went with her full name.Ohmyfifthharmony (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Might be useful to add the member's real names to the article. PC78 (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I will update their birth names on their official article to avoid further confusion. Ohmyfifthharmony (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Christianity in Israel. Deryck C. 19:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Christianity in Jerusalem → Jerusalem in Christianity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The words may be similar, but the meaning is totally different. I don't think this is a useful search term. @PPEMES: _signed, Rosguill ^talk 07:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Christianity in Israel as {{R from subtopic}}. There's a lot of discussion of Jerusalem there. I don't know a quick way to check how many "[Religion] in [City]" articles we have, but I would guess not many, so I don't have any concerns re: WP:REDLINK. --BDD (talk) 21:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Looking at titles starting "Christianity in" I've only spotted the following that are for cities or similar: Christianity in Ahka Villages, Christianity in Houston, Christianity in Omaha, Nebraska and Christianity in Puducherry. Christianity in Rome exists but this is a redirect to Religion in ancient Rome#Christianity in the Roman Empire. Of titles starting "Islam in" I've spotted Islam in Besançon, Islam in Birmingham (a redirect to Religion in Birmingham#Islam), Islam in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex, Islam in Metro Detroit, Islam in Houston and Islam in London. Islam in Jerusalem redirects to Islamization of Jerusalem. I've not looked for other religions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've now looked for "Judaism in" and while there are several of these they all seem to be redirects to "History of the Jews in" titles (e.g. Judaism in Los Angeles → History of the Jews in Los Angeles). Judaism in Marseille is an exception to this, redirecting to Religion in Marseille. There appear to be no articles or redirects titled "Buddhism in <city>" or "Hinduism in <city>". Thryduulf (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment having reread through the the target article and the redirect proposed by BDD, I now think that the original target is actually more appropriate, as it has more content about Christian presence in Jerusalem historically and less theological content than I originally assumed. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per BDD, with deletion being the second best choice. "Jerusalem in Christianity" generally covers, and should cover, the significance and symbolism of the city in Christian theology and tradition; this is things like the concept of Till we have built Jerusalem in Englands green & pleasant Land, or I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God. "Christianity in Jerusalem", however, should be an article covering (or a redirect to an article covering) the presence of Christianity in a particular Israeli city. Christianity in Israel has a good deal of content about Christians in Jerusalem, but if it's not a good target, we should delete this redirect to make way for a new article; obviously the presence of Christianity in Jerusalem has a longer history than the history of Christianity in places like Omaha or Pondicherry. Nyttend (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Christianity in Israel as an {{r from subtopic}} per BDD. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:02, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 14:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Parsey McParseface → RRS Sir David Attenborough#In popular culture  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not in target article. Seems like a Boaty McBoatface reference but no need to redirect here when there's no information about it Joseph2302 (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. It is in the target article but the section name has changed. Fixed redirect. Widefox; talk 21:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (per above) Widefox; talk 10:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the redirect now points to a section which is relevant to the redirect in question. The first sentence in the section talks about "Parsey McParseface". Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: A#Ajax. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ajax (superhero) → Martian Manhunter  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Apparently this name was used for this character in Brazil for a period of time. There's no mention of it in the article. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: A#Ajax and tag with {{R avoided double redirect|Ajax (comics)}}. While neither of the characters listed there seem to be superheroes, this still seems like a likely search term for a superhero. There can be a hatnote there for Martian Manhunter if ever warranted. --BDD (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Counos → Cryptocurrency  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. feminist (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Okay... It is simple one of the dozens of types of crytocurrencies (for which we have paid editors trying to write articles). Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirecting minor instances to the group is perfectly appropriate. Helps prevent more spam on the topic. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: Not on the list of cryptocurrencies sounds like WP:NOTDIR. –84.46.53.123 (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is a misleading redirect because someone searching for information on this will not find it at the target. The proper way to prevent spam on a topic for which Wikipedia does not have any information is to salt the page from being created. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete since not mentioned in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as is not at target. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt if a repeat problem. Widefox; talk 10:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Days of the Week panties → Undergarment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target; a PROD was previously applied by an administrator; I am making this discussion on their behalf. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not a particular brand. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.