Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 14

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator and no other delete or retarget arguments were presented. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 29 Years (film) → 26 Years  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. A simple typo; if you look at the article's very first revision it uses the film's correct title in the main text and infobox, so clearly just a mistake. PC78 (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The article indicates the original title of the screenplay was 29 years, and 29 years was originally intended to be the title of the movie. There are at least two sources in the article which refer to it as 29 years. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • My bad, I missed that in the article. Not sure how useful it really is but I guess it's valid so happy to withdraw. PC78 (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep and restore. Some were restored, the rest were either keep and retarget per discussion (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 04:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Citigold → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank, North America → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Canada → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Direct → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Ecuador → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Singapore IPB → Citibank Singapore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank South Dakota, N.A. → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Thailand → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank Vietnam → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Citibank vietnam → Citibank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete As we have determined previously, redirects from multiple non-notable products or business units to their parent company will certainly get WP:COSTLY UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Citibank, North America per the infobox. as a plausible error. Restore Citigold, Citibank Canada, Citibank Ecuador, Citibank Thailand, and Citibank Vietnam per WP:BLAR. Retarget Citibank vietnam to Citibank Vietnam if restored. Retarget Citibank Singapore IPB to Citibank International Personal Bank Singapore. Delete Neutral on Citibank South Dakota, N.A. per nom my comment below. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The infobox was incorrect and I corrected it: N.A. stands for "National Association," not "North America". UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I see that now. One other thing I want to point out is the article mentions thatCitibank chartered a South Dakota subsidiary to take advantage of new laws.... It appears the subsidiary is named "Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.", but I'm debating whether or not it's a plausible redirect. I'm going neutral for now. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I have no opinion on the redirects, but is RfD the appropriate venue to deal with what would effectively be deletion of redirected former articles? Or should they be restored and taken to AfD? --Paul_012 (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Paul 012: Generally articles that were redirected boldly or after a discussion that did not lead to a consensus to redirect should not be deleted at RfD but should be restored without prejudice to prod (if eligible) or AfD, unless the restored article would be speedily deleted. Retargetting such a redirect at RfD is usually regarded as fine. I've not looked at these redirects specifically yet. Thryduulf (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Either keep or restore Citigold, Citibank Canada, Citibank Ecuador, Citibank Thailand, and Citibank Vietnam, then, without prejudice against immediate PROD or AfD. Retarget Citibank Singapore IPB to Citibank International Personal Bank Singapore. No opinion on the rest. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.