Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 13

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Broglio, Switzerland. Nom included, everyone agrees on this ATD. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 01:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Brono → List of Germanic deities  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A putative Norse god listed in some reference works but apparently an invention or a misunderstanding. The page redirected to once listed Brono but no longer does. Haukur (talk) 22:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Broglio, Switzerland as {{R from former name}}. It may need disambiguation in the future if we get an article about the Brono Region of Ghana, or anyone by the surname. But for now I think it's the only Brono we've got. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  That makes sense! Haukur (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per 59.149.124.29. Plausible alternative to deletion. Geolodus (talk) 06:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per 59.149.124.29. Good catch! --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• New California Republic → Fallout (series)#Factions  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this fictional element following this. Pinging @Drmies: who carried the edit. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, as it stands there is no warrant for this redirect. It is possible that it might point to some reasonable decent verified text in the main article, but none of that was there. Thanks FoxyGrampa, Drmies (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're welcome. RFDs take one week (seven days) so it takes a while for other people to decide whether or not to keep the redirect. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Notability in the English Wikipedia. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 20:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia's notability policy → Wikipedia:Notability  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A cross namespace redirect, which are generally frowned upon due to the potential for confusion. I'm bringing this here to get a broader consensus on whether this should be kept. Note that while this may be useful for new editors unfamiliar with the structure of Wikipedia, it also is strictly incorrect, as WP:N is a guideline, not a policy. As such I would lean toward this being inappropriate, although I would likely weakly support keeping Wikipedia's notability guideline or Wikipedia's notability rules. Note also that there is a related mainspace article, Notability in the English Wikipedia, which may be a better target, and as of right now I would support redirecting to there. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Notability in the English Wikipedia per nominator. It makes sense to have this as an article-space title, and redirects are cheap, but if it's in article space it should point to an actual article about the notability guidelines, not to the guidelines themselves. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per David Eppstein. PC78 (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Notability in the English Wikipedia per nominator and David Eppstein. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Csw2014 → List of Super Wings episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An internet suggestion suggests that this acronym is not in broad use, most results are about UN conventions or academic conferences. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per below. -- /Alex/₂₁ 07:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Bs2015 → List of Blindspot episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Based on internet search results, this doesn't appear to have a particularly strong association with the current target. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect doesn't make sense to me either. David O. Johnson (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• "Bs2015" = "Blindspot 2015"? I dunno, but fully agree with a delete -- /Alex/₂₁ 06:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:51, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Tailsko → Tails (Sonic the Hedgehog)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Tailsco → Tails (Sonic the Hedgehog)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is, as far as I can tell, the name of a non-notable fan version of the character who is not (and definitely should not be) mentioned in the target article, and an implausible typo of the same non-notable fan-character. Both were created by the same user who has a habit of creating improper and trolling redirects. Neither are appropriate as redirects to the character page, and should be deleted.Rorshacma (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - creator of redirect has roughly zero constructive edits. Unless someone presents a compelling reason to think this is different, delete per nom. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per others above. Geolodus (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both. The WP:BEFORE revealed that this was the name of an nn fan-character of the equally-nn WP:SALTed Angry German Kid. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable and implausible. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Mersal (film). I will also tag the redirect with {{R from former name}}. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thalapathi (2017 film) → Atlee Kumar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Atlee has not directed any film named Thalapathi. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• No thalapathi title for Ilayathalapathy Vijay’s film with Sri Thenandal Films!. Appears to have been a tentative working title for Mersal (film). PC78 (talk) 07:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• In that case, I would suggest adding a mention of this working title to the article on Mersal (though probably with another source than that news article, which doesn't state this very clearly) and retargeting the redirect to said article. Geolodus (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.