Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 6

August 6

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 6, 2023.

Third Single

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Third Single → Big Bang 03 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This title is way too ambiguous. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For context: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 August 3. I see no good reason to keep it, but I don't do RfD often enough for me to cast a formal !vote. Jclemens (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete highly ambiguous and could easily refer to a huge range of targets. Someone at the DRV mentioned that K-pop singles are often referred to this way, but even if that's the case it could easily refer to another K-pop single. Hut 8.5 11:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – sorry, but I can't get behind redirecting Third Single to a single album with the alternate title of Big Bang Third Single. If that DRV discussion is to believed, this is a common enough idea in the K-pop industry that this PTM wouldn't be primary over any of them (a quick scan of search results was unhelpful), and disambiguation feels like a horrible idea here (are we going to include every album's third single?). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above comments, particularly about how disambiguation is impractical.—Alalch E. 08:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as ambiguous without prejudice to creation of Big Bang Third Single. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Beezy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Doe Boy (rapper). I wouldn't have objected to the early closure – bringing a redirect you want retargeted to RfD is optional, and one affirmation is often plenty. (non-admin closure) J947 † ^edits 08:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beezy → Beyoncé (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unable to find any sources referring to Beyoncé as "Beezy". Redirect to Doe Boy (rapper)? He has an album titled Beezy. मल्ल (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Doe Boy (rapper) per nom. I couldn't find any sources that referred to Beyoncé as Beezy, either. 〜 Askarion ✉ 12:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that this was closed as retarget by the nominator earlier today, which I reverted as an out-of-process involved SNOW close on what I'd say is not a case of SNOW. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Doe Boy (rapper) per nom. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rogério Lobo (dsambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rogério Lobo (dsambiguation) → Rogério Lobo (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Misspelt disambiguation qualifier. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 14:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom since this is a typical WP:RDAB situation. Duckmather (talk) 20:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 23:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete typical WP:RDAB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it was always a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone else. JIP | Talk 09:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

NTY (disambiguaton)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NTY (disambiguaton) → NTY (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Misspelt disambiguation qualifier; CSD was declined but these have been being routinely deleted. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 14:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom since this is a typical WP:RDAB situation. Duckmather (talk) 20:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete typical WP:RDAB. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom, typical WP:RDAB typo. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it was always a redirect and it should have been deleted under R3 at least until we get a specific criteria. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone else. JIP | Talk 09:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

A2100 roads

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A2100 roads → A2100 road (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible plural search term. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 14:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to A roads in Zone 2 of the Great Britain numbering scheme which lists any road that is A21xx. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is only one A2100, and A21xx roads are not referred to collectively (there is no other redirect of this plural type). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shhhnotsoloud. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hittite Communication

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 13#Hittite Communication

Belarusian mythology

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 23#Belarusian mythology

Partially hydrogenated oil

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to various targets as proposed by Synpath.. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partially hydrogenated oil → Hydrogenation#In the food industry (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Partially hydrogenated soybean oil → Trans fat (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil → Trans fat regulation (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

All three of these redirects go to different targets despite the topic in the redirect title being very similar, and I feel all three of these should go to one target. Colgatepony234 (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget all to Fat hydrogenation. The material in question has moved to that article (created in 2020) since I last retargeted one of these redirects in 2016. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not necessarily the same target.

Partially hydrogenated oil could be any oil natural or unnatural.
Partially hydrogenated soybean oil is very specific and has an obvious best target Soybean oil#Composition.
Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil is the clearest for Fat hydrogenation.

StarryGrandma's suggestion is best for Partially hydrogenated oil & Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil at the present time. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Each of these don't need the same target; Partially hydrogenated soybean oil and Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil are subtopics of soybean oil and vegetable oil, and those articles have sections touching on hydrogenation at Soybean oil#Composition and Vegetable_oil#Hydrogenation. The first redirect, Partially hydrogenated oil, is trickier since it technically could apply to any oil susceptible to hydrogenation, but Fat hydrogenation might just be the primary topic. ― Synpath 02:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil" has multiple suggested targets - Fat hydrogenation and Vegetable oil. Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and suggested targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Synpath's suggestion makes the most sense, so each target is as specific as the redirect-name. DMacks (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget as proposed by Synpath (talk · contribs). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).