Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 13

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex#AdventHealth Arena. Refined current target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The Arena (Walt Disney World) → ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex#The Arena  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The arena at Walt Disney World apparently sold its naming rights to AdventHealth and no longer operates under this name. However, its current name AdventHealth Arena is already a redirect to the existing page. CrownKing0wl (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine target to ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex#AdventHealth Arena and tag as {{R from former name}}. It still seems like a plausible search term to me. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 04:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine target to ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex#AdventHealth Arena as per Presidentman. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine target to ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex#AdventHealth Arena and tag as both {{R from former name}} and {{R avoided double redirect|AdventHealth Arena}}. "The Arena" is what it was called when it opened in 2018.[1] Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Paulmcdonald per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• John Cutbush (cricketer) → List of English cricket people to 1787#1741 to 1745  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article deleted via AfD in 2019 - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cutbush (cricketer) - but re-created by a sock of the original editor who created the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: WP:G5 per my comments below. TartarTorte 21:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Paulmcdonald per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• James Bryant (Kent cricketer) → List of English cricket people to 1787#1741 to 1745  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article deleted via AfD in 2019 - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bryant (cricketer) - but re-created by a sock of the original editor who created the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: Without commenting on the appropriateness of the redirect, this is eligible for WP:G5. TartarTorte 21:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Paulmcdonald per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• John Bryant (cricketer) → List of English cricket people to 1787#1741 to 1745  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article deleted via AfD in 2019 - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bryant (cricketer) - but re-created by a sock of the original editor who created the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete: Without commenting on the appropriateness of the redirect, this is eligible for WP:G5. TartarTorte 21:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Paulmcdonald per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Tom Peake → List of English cricket people to 1787#1741 to 1745  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article deleted via PROD in 2019, but re-created by a sock of the original editor who created the article. The rationale for the PROD was "Non first-class cricketer, fails WP:CRIN. Besides playing cricket, there's nothing else that can be found of note to satisfy WP:GNG." This remains true and we'd never have an article on the 18th century person who played cricket - no chance of them ever meeting current sports notability guidelines.

There are a number of other Tom Peakes who may at some point become notable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Paulmcdonald per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Ridgeway (Sussex cricketer) → List of English cricket people to 1787#1741 to 1745  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article deleted via PROD in 2018, but re-created by a sock of the original editor who created the article. The rationale for the PROD was "Didn't play first-class cricket so fails NCRIC. Lack of actual information beyond a surname means fails WP:V and WP:GNG. We simply don't have enough to show notability or build a biography." That remains true - we have a surname and there is never going to be any chance whatsoever that we can build an article here and the search term is extremely unlikely to ever be used. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 21:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Finalnd → Finland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I think this is an implausible redirect but I'm not sure if it's implausible enough for R3, so I'm starting an RfD discussion. Anyone think this should just be R from misspelling instead? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Plausible misspellings (i.e. spelling mistakes) make good redirects. Typos (typing mistakes) do not make good redirects. Recently created, so safe to delete. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete as per Mdewman6, but keeping it as R from misspelling is not out completely out of the question. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 11:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The redirect was recently created and may qualify for R3. Mast303 (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 21:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• StudentBusinesses.com → Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect was WP:PROD'd by Rublamb with the nom statement "not mentioned on redirect page; also no longer exists". I procedurally am nominating it here. TartarTorte 14:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This redirect is a {{R with history}} that was subject to a WP:BLAR after being an article during 2009–2015. Steel1943 (talk) 03:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Did the content get merged anywhere, or is it just... history? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 02:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The Foundation did purchase StudentBusinsses.com [2] and WP:CHEAP. If it's due, add a mention of the purchase to the target (which feels like it should be expanded) but otherwise it's a slightly helpful hint if we're not keeping the previous article. Skynxnex (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore article - article existed for many years before being BLARed. Alternatively, if mention can be added to the current target then that's fine also. Status quo is unacceptable as someone searching this will be left confused without even a mention. A7V2 (talk) 06:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep redirect or restore article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore article without prejudice to AfD or merger if someone desires. Thryduulf (talk) 09:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Travis May#Career where it is described. The website doesn't appear to exist anymore, so highly unlikely an article would be kept if sent to Afd. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).