Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Atlantic Island Airways → Summerside Airport#History  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect should be a WP:REDLINK to signify that no article exists about the topic. The redirect leads to the history section of the article about one of the only two airports that the airline apparently served, but the target article contains no other information about the airline aside from the year and the type of aircraft it used. Carguychris (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under G7 by Fastily. As for stymieing further discussion, we did get almost a full week of discussion out of it with consensus to delete. If not for that, I'd suggest leaving this open and if consensus ends up being anything other than delete, to restore/recreate it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2Pca → Tupac Shakur  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo / search term. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, the typo is likely to be noticed by the user immediately, and the daily pageviews of the redirect have never even reached double digits. Carguychris (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: redirects are cheap. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: typo does not make good redirect. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted under G7 by Fastily earlier today. That rather stymies further disucssion... Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 13:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Act for the Marriage of Queen Mary to Philip of Spain. ✗plicit 14:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Philip and Mary of England → Mary I of England  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect to Act for the Marriage of Queen Mary to Philip of Spain - A redirect with both of their names should not go just to Mary. Philip and Mary also redirects to the proposed target. estar8806 (talk) ★ 12:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom consistent with Philip and Mary. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. No solid reason for deletion was provided outside of it being an unlikely search term, which has been countered. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Henry VIII (1491–1547) → Henry VIII  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Henry VIII (1491-1547) → Henry VIII  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - While unnecessary disambiguation is generally good for redirects, I can't see this one being useful, especially considering Henry's dates of life are likely something readers will be looking for, not something they will already know. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – not helpful but nor harmful. J947 † ^edits 04:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both per J947. That format is correct and may even be helpful to some people. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 05:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947. If those weren't his birth and death dates, there would be a problem, but they are, so there isn't. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a remotely plausible search term. Hut 8.5 16:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per WP:CHEAP; not harmful. While these are not common search terms I do not see them as implausible either. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If you come upon a source that lists his dates and you want to learn more on Wikipedia, and you know there are multiple Henry VIII's, this is a plausible way to try to find his article to guarantee not having to mess with a disambiguation page. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• George III Guelph → George III  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete - Usage generally is abysmal. Usage in reliable sources, seemingly non-existent. [1] estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:25, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: nonsensical. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).