Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 23

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Football at the 2028 Summer Olympics - Men's tournament → 2028 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Football at the 2028 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament → 2028 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Football at the 2028 Summer Olympics - Men's qualification → 2028 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Football at the 2028 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification → 2028 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as too soon. The article is silent about the qualification process. The only thing said about the tournament itself is the potential stadia to be used, which is too incidental to sustain a redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. A7V2 (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON; not many people will search for this at this time. These redirects can be recreated later if necessary. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as WP:TOOSOON. They can be recreated when there is actual information regarding the tournament. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as above. GiantSnowman 19:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Bermuda at the 2024 Summer Olympics → 2024 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics → 2024 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Indonesia at the 2024 Summer Olympics → 2024 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Panama at the 2024 Summer Olympics → 2024 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Virgin Islands at the 2024 Summer Olympics → 2024 Summer Olympics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Eritrea was recently deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27#Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics, but rather than G4 it, I think it's better to also discuss the rest of the redirects in this set. I think this is a straightforward delete per WP:REDLINK to show there is not yet an article at 2024 Summer Olympics#Participation. If athletes are participating, then an article on the topic is notable and should be created. If athletes are not participating, they should be removed from that table so there wouldn't be a mention anyway. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eritrea was draftified. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10 and previous discussion. No prejudice against article creation if/when suitable. A7V2 (talk) 08:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging participants at the previous discussion: @JML1148, Edward-Woodrow, and Randi Moth:. A7V2 (talk) 08:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, A7V2 and previous discussion. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 09:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Mode. ✗plicit 23:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The mode → Depeche Mode  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is this really a common nickname for the band? Even if so, is it really safe to assume someone searching for such a fairly generic phrase is looking for Depeche Mode? 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:F96E:195F:9EAE:53E1 (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to The Mode as a {{r from miscapitalization}}. - Eureka Lott 04:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to The Mode per Eureka Lott. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to The Mode per Eureka Lott and mark as r from miscap. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to The Mode: {{R from miscapitalization}}. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Dr. sixshot → Transformers: Generation 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Originally created as an extremely short article that said just "Dr. sixshot" and then quickly speedy deleted and recreated as a redirect to Sixshot, which was itself changed to a redirect to The Transformers (TV series), so the redirect target was changed to Transformers: Generation 1.

There has never been any actual content in the "Dr. sixshot" article. A redirect to Transformers: Generation 1 or The Transformers (TV series) would be misleading as the Transformers character is called Sixshot, no one has ever called him with a "Dr." prefix. The name even contains a capitalisation error: "sixshot" vs. "Sixshot". There apparently is a real-life dance musician called Dr. Sixshot but Wikipedia does not seem to have any content about him/her.

I propose this redirect should just be deleted. JIP | Talk 16:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The name is incorrectly capitalized and no character by that exact name exists in the target article's franchise. 〜 Askarion ✉ 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the above. Sixshot should probably itself be deleted since there is no mention of this character at the target, and the former article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixshot (no merge appears to have taken place). A7V2 (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would think a better idea would be to change the redirect target of Sixshot to Transformers: Generation 1. It would suffice to add a short description of the Sixshot toy to the appropriate section of the year it was introduced in. JIP | Talk 15:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Well yes that would be best but as is often the case with redirects to articles without mention, no mention is ever added. A7V2 (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Etivac → Cavite  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unhelpful, fails WP:RPURPOSE- "etivac" is "cavite" backwards. Delete unless a better target can be found. (Note: based on my searches, it looks to be a reference to some kind of meme. WP:NOTNEO.) Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, looks like nothing better than a frivolous redirect. JIP | Talk 16:08, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete obscure synonym at best --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete : unhelpful and fails WP:RPURPOSE. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Post nut clarity → Post-coital tristesse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Proposing deletion — comments at Talk:Post-coital_tristesse#"Post-nut clarity" an opposite? suggest ‘post nut clarity’ is not the same as ‘post-coital tristesse’, and the term ‘post-nut clarity’ was recently removed from the destination article. A smart kitten (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Thanks for this. I do doubt whether we'll have an encyclopedic article on post-nut clarity any time soon. We have {{R from antonym}} but that's a redirect category I'd want to be very careful with, since there should be some context or an obvious relationship between the redirect's term and the target. --BDD (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Restore article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Lori (Iron & Wine EP) → Iron & Wine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Only one short mention at target- unhelpful to the reader. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 13:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert to last version as a separate article. There's enough coverage from reliable sources to justify an article. - Eureka Lott 04:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore per Eureka Lott and nom. Also, given this includes the disambiguation someone searching this already knows the name of the artist. Pinging BLARer FormalDude. Can be taken to AfD if desired. A7V2 (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Searching For Soul Food → List of Hulu original programming  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

not present in target article -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This nomination was missing the target of the redirect; this has been fixed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn in favor of AfD. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Michaela Clavell → James Clavell  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Bit-part actress that was redirected to her father, where she is not mentioned. I could not restore and send to AfD because the last revision included a blacklisted external link. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you not just edit out the blacklisted link while restoring it? QuicoleJR (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was resolved. I went ahead and completed the round-robin page move. See my comment below for details. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Minerva Bunkering (version 2) → Minerva Bunkering  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Improbable redirect title. Appears to have been part of some page moves around Minerva Bunkering and not something intended as a permanent redirect. It's possible it was retained for attribution history but I don't see any edits at the target page that reference it for attribution. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 05:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• This was the way that Anthony Appleyard performed round-robin page moves. Page B (Minerva Bunkering) moved to Page C (Minerva Bunkering (version 2)) and Page A (Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc.) moved to Page B (Minerva Bunkering). The problem is that Anthony Appleyard often neglected to finalize step 3 (Move C → A), leaving behind this ugly redirect. What now needs to happen is that Minerva Bunkering (version 2) should be moved to Aegean Marine Petroleum Network Inc. without leaving a redirect to finish the steps. This set of redirects was discussed at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 82#Set of articles using "title/version x" format last year, after which I tackled a few hundred of them before burning out. I should resurrect that project... -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. This is a search term that was in enough use to even appear in sources. Just because a redirect is from an incorrect name doesn't make it invalid – there is no policy-based reason that this should be deleted. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance → Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Incorrect name shouldn't be redirect, it can make confusion... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Indian_National_Developmental_Inclusive_Alliance#Merge DSP2092^talk 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Echoing @Abecedare's CSD decline [1], it is a valid redirect from an incorrect term and would aid readers. The RS were even unsure initially [2] — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @DaxServer, There is difference between Democratic and Developmental. Here leader of I.N.D.I.A. in video ->

  link clearly states official name. Even if it was a confusion, it is incorrect. We can't keep incorrect names. It will create more confusions. DSP2092^talk 12:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That is exactly what {{R from incorrect name}} is for - for valid incorrect names. Please do some reading at Wikipedia:Redirect — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  But it is not valid incorrect name. Because it makes whole meaning of I.N.D.I.A. different - Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance#Name DSP2092^talk 13:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I find myself repeating myself apparently. The RS have initially noted, thus it is due to be placed as a redirect. Goodbye — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 13:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per DaxServer. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Plimp → Hybrid airship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Apparently refers to a specific product line by Plimp Airships, rather than a generic nickname for a Hybrid airship. The name is also used for various urban English terms as per Urban Dictionary. BilCat (talk) 00:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and the fact that this is not mentioned at the target. A7V2 (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).