Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 31

March 31

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2023.

Wikipedia:COMMONKNOWLEDGE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Common knowledge. Salvio giuliano 21:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely this should point to WP:Common knowledge? Of 5 backlinks, 2 clearly intend that, and the other 3 are ambiguous but I think more likely mean that than the current target (which does not contain the phrase "common knowledge" once). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, retarget. It's what I would expect that redirect to lead to. DFlhb (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zero-G Datafiles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Zero-G Ltd. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Result of a link to an ambiguous page name and subsequent double-redirect fixing. I can't find any article on the intended subject, which is a series of audio sample CDs. Omphalographer (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have no memory of this, but looking at the article history, it looks like this was my own dumb fault. I redirected the article to Zero-G apparently under the impression that this was an article about the audio company Zero-G, which is obviously not the case. As we have no proper place to redirect to, let's just kill it. Popcornfud (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Popcornfud: We have an article about Zero-G Ltd. Is that the company you are referencing? - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! Yes, that's right. Thank you. I've updated the redirect to point to that page. Popcornfud (talk) 21:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Merry Little Batman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This animated special seems to have been among the animated projects cancelled at HBO Max in 2022. ★Trekker (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Move (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Snow Keep. Most of ErceÇamurOfficial (talk · contribs) listings on RFD usually ends in a keep, and this discussion is no exception. Before nominating any more redirects, please read Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, Wikipedia:Redirect, and Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think Ludacris' song is the primary topic. I suggest retargeting to Move Bitch. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

When Laura smiles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus appears to be to maintain the redirect as is with added {{R from work}} and {{R without mention}} tags. (non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) Estar8806 (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 intended to nominate this redirect for discussion, but was blocked by a script bug. I have now fixed the issue, so they can provide their rationale here. signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. And thanks for fixing it. My concern is that I do not know what this phrase has to do with the target, since it is not mentioned there. Onel5969 TT me 16:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zero-entry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 21:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per third party search engines, the concept of "zero-entry" is not exclusive to pools. Apparently, this refers to the lack of a set of stairs leading to/from a different flat elevation, which can also apply to certain doorways or showers/bathtubs. Steel1943 (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak disambig. The most common meaning seems to be the swimming pool type (an exact synonym for "beach entry", discussed above) but not to the extent of being clear primary topic. It is also used as a synonym for generic step-free access using shallow gradients, for things that have no entry cost (including loans) and zero entry mining (mechanised to the extent that humans do not need to enter the mine). However I'm not sure to what extent the latter two are just partial title matches, and we don't seem to have any content about the mining use anyway. Thryduulf (talk) 02:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as the term overwhelmingly used on enwiki to refer to the pools, and in many instances, used simply as "Zero entry" without the "swimming pool" qualifier. May be disambiguated if there are other usages on enwiki. If there is only one other usage, hatnote to that, with pools as the primary. I see Visitability that talks about the zero-step entrances per nom. Similar to the redirect Step-free access, but that leads to Accessibility. Jay 💬 07:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yungur language

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8#Yungur language

Tards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of disability-related terms with negative connotations#T. Salvio giuliano 07:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SSRT: "Please keep in mind that only topics with a less-than-encyclopedic scope that are commonly wikified words or that are repeatedly recreated should become soft redirects. We don't need a soft redirect for every possible word or phrase to be included in Wikipedia." A redirect for the plural of an informal version of an insult. No idea why this would belong on Wikipedia Fram (talk) 09:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iravaakaalam

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 17#Iravaakaalam

MedCrave Group, LLC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No information at the target, one of thousands of predatory publishers. It's not special enough to deserve its own mention. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IntechOpen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 03:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No information at the target, one of thousands of predatory publishers, though would be more accurately described as a vanity press than a predatory publisher. It's not special enough to deserve its own mention. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC) To list multiple related redirects for discussion, use the following syntax. Repeat line 2 for N number of redirects:[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Richest people of Ukraine (2009)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 7#Richest people of Ukraine (2009)

Sm.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8#Sm.

2026 Berlin state election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 2026 elections did not happen yet, and now the 2023_Berlin_state_election did happen ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This should absolutely be a redlink per WP:REDYES. It doesn't help people to target the 2023 election if they are searching for info about the 2026 election, especially when one of the more prominent links to the 2026 Berlin state election is from the infobox nav in the 2023 Berlin repeat state election article. This was created from a move from the 2026 page to 2023 but the edit history is at the location of the moved article. The edit history here is slightly troubling as an article was BLARred after a declined PROD, but the page was unsourced and one sentence at time of BLARring, so I am ok with deletion in spite of that somewhat weird page history. TartarTorte 12:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_31&oldid=1150350889"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 31, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.