Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Dub Piece → One Piece  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target and that it had no views in the last several months makes me doubt it's a plausible search term. Link20XX (talk) 22:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete seems to be an obscure nickname --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oh wow, I completely forgot this existed. This was a link to the former page for the English dub back when 4Kids had the license. People often referred to it as "Dub Piece" due to how edited it was, and anyone active in the One Piece fandom in those years probably knows about 4Kids' notoriety there. But I don't think anyone uses that anymore and 4Kids hasn't had the license in over a decade so if you want to delete it, I don't care anymore. Matty-chan (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Gun rehearsal debate in United States film → Rust shooting incident#Prop gun debate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is clumsily misleading. The debate was over using guns as props, not about "gun rehearsals". -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or retarget The section I targeted doesn't cover the entire subject. None of the sections are sufficient alone but several combine to cover the topic. The best target is probably the entire article → Rust shooting incident without specifying a section. Invasive Spices (talk) 00:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. - Eureka Lott 18:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 1995 NHL season → 1994–95 NHL season  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 2013 NHL season → 2012–13 NHL season  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 2021 NHL season → 2020–21 NHL season  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These redirects go to NHL season that due to strike or COVID-19, were only played in the year listed at the redirect; however, for all of these seasons, there also exists a season that was started later in the year specified, making these redirects potentially ambiguous. For example, the 1994–95 NHL season took place only in 1995; however, there was also the 1995–96 NHL season, which did begin in 1995. The same goes for 2013 and 2021. I was taking this to RfD to see if this should stay as is or turn into a DAB page. There are hat notes at the respective articles already. TartarTorte 20:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I left a notice on WT:HOCKEY about this as well. TartarTorte 22:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I find these re-directs to be somewhat misleading. Whether games were played or not, NHL business still continued. GoodDay (talk) 23:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all. I'm not seeing the ambiguity. 162 etc. (talk) 23:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of NHL seasons and add an anchor to the earlier season in the table. That way if someone searches for 1995 NHL season, they will be redirected to the 1994–95 season entry in the table and the 1995–96 season will be directly under it should that actually be the season they want. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as Tavix suggests. Thryduulf (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Tavix. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Tavix. The Kip 19:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Methionylthreonylthreonylglutaminylarginyltyrosylglutamylserylleucylphenylalanylalanylglutaminylleucyllysylglutamylarginyllysylglutamylglycylalanylphenylalanylvalylprolylphenylalanylvalylthreonylleucylglycylaspartylprolylglycylisoleucylglutamylglutaminyls → Titin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While Titin does have a long name, titles such as this feel quite excessive and not likely to be searched to this length (255 characters). Outcomes such as the pi redirects come to mind as past precedent. Even if the title may be technically accurate (although most of the protein's name is cut off due to limitations), we wouldn't include 255 digits of pi as a redirect "just because it's accurate", because it's not common to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I highly doubt anyone will ever type that long name into a search engine. Govvy (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, harmless. —Kusma (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While the chemical name of titin has some notoriety as supposedly the longest word in English (even though no one really uses it), this is not the chemical name of titin as given here - [1], nor is the sequence same as here - [2] (the sequence should start MTTQAPTF, while this sequence starts MTTQRYES). I have no idea what the sequence is, it could be nonsense, therefore delete. Hzh (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Hzh notes, this is not the sequence for any isoform of human or mouse titin; only the first four amino acids match (of ~34000 total). It's nonsensical to search for proteins this way, and anyone trying this is likely not interested in reading about titin. Besides, if this is kept it would suggest that all proteins should be searchable by their sequence on Wikipedia either spelt out like this or by short forms (i.e. WP:PANDORA). ― Synpath 17:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  For interest: I ran a search of the SwissProt database and the sequence here most closely matches various TrpA proteins (~90%), which is listed as the "longest published word" at Longest word in English. ― Synpath 17:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sequence does not appear to be in any database, so it does not matter if it is related to TrpA or not. It could be something made up by someone, and if it exists then it would be a very obscure one, and no one will search this term. Hzh (talk) 09:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked into it, I'm now pretty certain that this is a nonsense sequence. Someone simply used the starting sequence for titin, then attached part of the sequence for TrpA (sequence may be found here - https://jeff560.tripod.com/words13.html ), and came up with the above sequence. It's just something someone made up, so it needs to be deleted. Hzh (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Methionylthreonylthreonylglutaminylalanyl...isoleucine → Titin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The ellipsis in the middle of the word seems to make this an implausible search term. Admittedly, Titin is known for its extremely long scientific name, but utilizing exactly the first 41 characters, followed by an ellipsis plus the remaining 10 characters, does not seem to be very plausible way of searching. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nom comment, the name also appears to be a misspelling, because the longer version (that is also implausible) redirect uses "larginyl" before where the ellipsis would be, instead of the lalanyl here. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "alanyl" is correct, "arginyl" is wrong. Hzh (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 11:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete implausible search as the insertion of ellipses is arbitrary in addition to the sequence being ambiguous. While I won't search for any examples I guarantee the sequence MTTQA*I matches many other proteins. ― Synpath 17:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Judaism and terrorism → Jewish extremist terrorism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Judaism and terror → Jewish extremist terrorism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The phrases "Judaism and terrorism" and "Judaism and terror" could equally describe terror/terrorism committed in the name of Judaism or terror/terrorism committed against Judaism. Absent such clarity, I think red links would be better here. BD2412 T 20:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. Veverve (talk) 05:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Rangoon(Film) → Rangoon (2017 Hindi film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Disambiguation error. If kept, should be retargeted to Rangoon (disambiguation) as WP:INCOMPDAB. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. While I don't have any problem with the capitalized disambiguator, the lack of a space between the title and disambiguator makes this redirect implausible. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to malformed dabifier --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RDAB as both missing space and incorrect capitalization. It was here for less than a month in 2015. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above and WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Marc Hamburg → Berkshire Hathaway  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no mention of him at the target, so anyone searching for information on him will be left none the wiser. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. When this was created in 2015, the name was listed at the target as CFO and Senior VP. Jay 💬 17:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Yan Daudu ( Queer &Hausa Fulani Sub Culture ) → Yan daudu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect name itself has sloppy spacing and is not sentence case. There is no reference in the article to this and no evidence anyone would search for it. The brackets are unnecessary as there is no disambiguation. JacobTheRox (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, contains several errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per everything. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. What a mess! –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 11:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RDAB, it was at this title for a few hours 11 days ago, could probably be deleted as R3. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above and WP:RDAB. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly WP:RDAB. NM 19:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was replace with stub. While a numerical majority favors deletion, it is beyond RfD's jurisdiction to delete a page that contains a valid article. If Janhrach or TartarTorte feel that the stub should be deleted, they are of course welcome to take it to AfD. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 00:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Next Slovak parliamentary election → 2023 Slovak parliamentary election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer accurate. Janhrach (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per WP:REDYES. An article is generally written at Next _ parliamentary election about the election that is coming up after the current one, when a date for said election is not known due to the nature of parliamentary systems. As such an article does not exist, it should exist here and this should not target an election in the past, which can be confusing. TartarTorte 13:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• We can just create a new article at this location. A Redirect for Discussion article seems an unnecessarily long-winded way of going about this. Bondegezou (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The stub there provides only very little information. I do still support deletion. Janhrach (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong venue. This is a challenge of an AfD close and so belongs at WP:DRV. Thryduulf (talk) 10:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Green Gully Reserve → Green Gully SC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Green Gully Reserve, is a large area, not just a stadium, which can be multi-use, but it incorporates other clubs and has a very large park area. Per the links I posted at AfD. So why Liz followed the illogical consensus and didn't relist, I fail to see some common-sense from other users at the article AfD. But the correct redirect should have been to Keilor Downs, Victoria and not a football club article. It also required a merge of content too Keilor Downs which has yet to be done. Govvy (talk) 09:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Govvy it sounds like you are principally contesting the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Gully Reserve. If so then you are at the wrong venue, you want Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thryduulf (talk) 09:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf: After how Talk:George_Andrews_Reserve article went down, I went this route, I only want to redirect to the article it should be redirected too, I still feel Green Gully Reserve should be kept as a park article know. Because the park side is far larger than where the stadium and clubs are located. Not enough people took part in the AfD discussion for me to established a decent consensus, I do feel I've been fighting a loosing battle over the article and I did have a go at trying to make it somewhat better. Govvy (talk) 10:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to keep Green Gully Reserve as an article you are definitely in the wrong location as that is not an outcome that can result from a discussion here. Your comments also indicate that you disagree with the closure of the AfD, so I'm closing this as the wrong venue. WP:DRV is the right venue, but I don't have time right now to file there on your behalf. Thryduulf (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The sound of children screaming has been removed → Robb Elementary School shooting#Hallway_video  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No encyclopedic value, this is just a quote from a comment made about the video and is not even some unique observation about the video. Sohom (talk) 09:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaning keep. This specific comment seems to be uniquely associated to this specific event with every hit on the first three pages of google results being related to it. It seems to have become a meme of sorts. Thryduulf (talk) 10:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. This word-for-word phrase is heavily associated with the Austin American-Statesman video. It was even mentioned in an MSNBC broadcast discussing that video. XTheBedrockX (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not from the United States and was unaware of this rather weird "meme". I understand that the phrasing is currently being associated with the widely circulated video. However, I wonder if redirect might confuse people who are not in on the joke/meme, since this phrasing might be used in outside of the american political system (for example, a normal school commercial might contain such a disclaimer when depicting (say) children playing in the football field). Sohom (talk) 21:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Sohom Datta There is no joke, and I'm not sure where you got this impression. It's a notable phrase associated with a grim event (and emblematic, for some people, about the lack of safety American children have from gun violence). It seems highly unlikely that someone specifically searching this phrase on English Wikipedia would be looking for a "normal school commercial". XTheBedrockX (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @XTheBedrockX The first few Google search hits include links to shops selling this catch-phrase as merchandise, that along with the previous mentions of "meme" which I tend to associate with a joke (even if it is a sarcastic one) made me assume that this phrase was being viewed from that point of view. I am deeply sorry (and apologize) if that hurt your feelings on the matter.

  That being said, I do disagree that this phrasing is intrinsically linked to the video since it seems to heavily assume that everyone is familiar with the ongoing issues in America. I will agree to disagree with you on this point for now and let the RfD run it's course though :) Sohom (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no mention at the target. Without mention, the there is no way to know why one is redirected here. I am not aware of this event, so I do not know when or by whom this sentence was uttered and the WP article does not mention this sentence nor its context of utterance. Veverve (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, reasonably relevant, fact mentioned at target even if not with the exact phrasing, not difficult to figure out what this is about. —Kusma (talk) 07:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate at Skolar, and retarget Skolar (disambiguation) to Skolar. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Skolar → London Skolars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Skolar (disambiguation) → London Skolars  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This invalid two-entry disambiguation page was converted into a redirect, but "London Skolars" are not referred to in the singular. Pinging @Pppery:. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Skolar to scholar Plausible phonetic spelling. Delete Skolar (disambiguation) per WP:ONEOTHER. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retain Skolar as the most plausible target. Delete Skolar (disambiguation) as maintenance, because it is unnecessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate Skolar for the London Skolars (who indeed use "Skolar" in the singular to refer to their members [3]), Yaakov Yitzchak Skolar, and the various WP:DABMENTIONs like the company founded by Phyllis Gardner (clinical pharmacologist), and put anything with a similar spelling like Scholar and Walter Scolar in WP:DABSEEALSO. One of the correctly-spelled usages might be WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT in which case we wouldn't need a dab page, but this shouldn't be a redirect to Scholar. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 05:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig per the anon. Thryduulf (talk) 15:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate Skolar per 59.149.117.119. Oppose retarget to Scholar per WP:SMALLDETAILS, although it would be fine to place Scholar (disambiguation) and Skolar (disambiguation) in each other's See also sections. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 14:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Óльга А. Лады́женская → Olga Ladyzhenskaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Óльга Алекса́ндровна Лады́женская → Olga Ladyzhenskaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Óльга Лады́женская → Olga Ladyzhenskaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Ó at the beginning is actually Latin-script instead of cyrillic; delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Her name was written with an Ó instead of О́ in the Russian writing of her name on the page until I just fixed it, explaning the creation of said redirects. Having said that, these are pretty implausible and only seem to exist due to that being on the page like that. TartarTorte 17:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this was in fact the reason why I created these redirects. Thanks for fixing. I have created a new set of redirects with the proper spelling now. Regarding the old redirects, I think there is a better solution than to delete them, see below. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, but add R from misspelling. Since the Roman and Cyrillic letter look identical in many fonts, I don't think the misspelling is all too implausible - occasionally users might pick up the improper mixed spelling somewhere (like I did) and enter it into our search engine. It is better to still forward them to the correct article and educate them about the proper spelling than to come up blank as if we won't have contents about the topic. We also have a dedicated Rcat for this purpose: {{R from misspelling}}. Applying it to these redirects will even allow bots to automatically correct this would someone use the wrong spelling in articles. I have therefore applied the Rcat to the redirects in question. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all as mixed script redirects, which have routinely been deleted many times over at RfD in the past. Duckmather (talk) 03:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per precedent with mixed script redirects --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep neither accent/letter is native to English, so if someone is searching these terms in English wikipedia there's reasonable liklihood they won't know there's mixed script. Proposing based on common outcomes list and supporting based on common outcomes are both circular. - Darker Dreams (talk) 16:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Even if Ó used Cyrillic, it is not an actual separate letter in Russian. Instead, it's the regular о with the ◌́ symbol for indicating vowel stress. They were added in 2012 to the article with an edit summary of "per MOS", though I can't find the exact entry in the MoS for this, with the only thing I found being WP:RUSTRESS, an essay about keeping it out of the English Wikipedia. The Russian Wikipedia's Manual of Style recommends it as the way to mark stress, and so it's used in the lead of the Russian article. It's unlikely for this to be searched for. Randi🦋^Talk_Contribs 20:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all, mixed script version of uncommon Russian-with-stress accents. —Kusma (talk) 20:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Disinformation attack. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disinformation campaign → Disinformation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Disinformation attack seems a more direct match. fgnievinski (talk) 05:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Disinformation attack per nom. --(Roundish ✡t) 19:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to KSI (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Ksi → Pound per square inch#Multiples  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This generic acronym should be pointing to Ksi (disambiguation) rather than a subsection of Pound per square inch. Even Psi does not redirect there. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) as ambiguous. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – The only other target currently on KSI (disambiguation) that may be referred to as "Ksi" or "ksi" is Ksi (Cyrillic), a letter that wasn't used in any language since the 18th century. Out of the two, ksi (unit) is clearly the primary topic. Randi🦋^Talk_Contribs 06:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) as likely alternative capitalisation (arguably erroneous, but we redirect misspellings too). This redirect traps all-lowercase "ksi" too, and we should not expect readers looking for eg Killed or Seriously Injured, especially with one hand on restricted mobile keyboards, to enter "KSI" or even know that that's the normal capitalisation. NebY (talk) 08:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) per NebY. Thryduulf (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) per above and of course move KSI (disambiguation) to Ksi, as with Psi. Even if one argues keep per WP:SMALLDETAILS despite NebY's argument, one must also maintain that Kilopounds per square inch—which is only a section—is the primary topic over Ksi (Cyrillic)—which is an entire article. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 14:25, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) per above. 〜 Askarion ✉ 22:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to KSI (disambiguation) per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• W：/2016Album/ → /2016Album/  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely, given that the colon used isn't a regular one (:), it is a "fullwidth colon" (：). Edward-Woodrow • talk 21:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. The correct title for this article, W:/2016Album/, cannot be used due to the conflict with the interwiki prefix so workarounds are needed. Using a full-width colon is one such workaround that is plausible (if not necessarily the most plausible), so I'm leaning keep per WP:CHEAP but will move to delete if anybody presents evidence of this actually causing problems. Thryduulf (talk) 01:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • W:/2016Album/ actually works, and doesn't go through a redirect. This is a strange one. See Talk:/2016Album/ for some discussion. There's also a redirect at W꞉/2016Album/, which looks the same but is different. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it is technically correct, as it is a colon. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 23:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: since one of the keep !votes is "weak".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per everyone above. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Fading kitten syndrome → Neonatal isoerythrolysis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The current target is most definitely not accurate; FKS is essentially failure to thrive due to a whole host of issues (usually unidentified), NI being an extremely rare one and not representative of typical symptoms. This should probably redirect to a (presently non-existent) section on "other animals" at failure to thrive. JoelleJay (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep if the nonexistent material is ever created, the redirect can be changed. In the meantime, it’s the most likely thing people are looking for. Montanabw^(talk) 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A plausible search term given that there are many books that mention the syndrome - [4]. Could possibly redirect the term to something better, but that's not a reason to delete. What it can be redirected into can be a different discussion. Given the sources available, it could possibly be expanded into its own article, so the redirect can stay until someone takes the time to turn it into an article. Hzh (talk) 08:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Hzh. NotAGenious (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).