Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 4, 2024.
Luips
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Implausible misspelling. wbm1058 (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fruit Luips, which is slightly more plausible, was created by the same user at the same time as the nominated redirect. - Eureka Lott 16:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm guessing this was a joke redirect based on the misspelling of Froot (ie. "if the two words rhyme then why is it Froot Loops rather than Fruit Luips"). Pointless redirect, implausable misspelling, web search results don't indicate "Froot Loops" as the ptopic - delete. BugGhost🦗👻 17:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Alexeyevitch(talk) 05:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - even assuming this is more a ghoti situation, this is not a plausible redirect by any stretch of the imagination, and there's really no feasible retarget. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Gamma 0
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 19:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Gamma 0 → Feferman–Schütte ordinal (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Γ₀ → Feferman–Schütte ordinal (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Also the notation for Hecke congruence subgroups. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn’t mind having this become a disambiguation page linking to both, but let’s not just delete it. That doesn’t help anyone. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- To be more concrete: I proposed retargeting Gamma 0 to Γ₀ and making Γ₀ into a disambiguation page linking to both Feferman–Schütte ordinal and Hecke congruence subgroup or Congruence subgroup. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
I don't know enough about this area to concretely determine a WP:PTOPIC but Feferman–Schütte ordinal is an article that references Γ₀ in it's opening sentence, while Hecke congruence subgroups is just listed as one example of a Congruence subgroup, one that isn't even directly named in a heading - I am leaning to saying Feferman–Schütte ordinal is the primary topic here. So I would vote keep, but add a hatnote to Congruence subgroup (which redirects to Congruence subgroup#Examples) BugGhost🦗👻 18:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- jraimbau makes a very good point that contents of wikipedia pages shouldn't determine what is a primary topic. Changing my opinion to Disambiguate per the below. BugGhost🦗👻 19:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with creating a disambiguation page. I don't think Feferman–Schütte ordinals are the primary topic here since the Hecke congruence subgroups are the most important examples of congruence subgroups and their place in wikipedia does not necessarily reflect their importance in current mathematics (they could easily have their own article). I'll admit that i'm not familiar with the ordinals but briefly looking through the article they do not seem to be of paramount importance in their own field. jraimbau (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have an opinion as to which topic is more primary, but a DAB page seems to make the most sense, especially because more uses will probably come to light. (Greek letter + 0 is a pretty basic construction.) The important thing is helping users who see the notation but don't know what it stands for. - CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with CRGreathouse. JRSpriggs (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Disambiguate per CRGreathouse. In my personal experience I've seen the congruence subgroup meaning more often so I think the ordinal notation is not primary, and I think disambiguating (despite only two meanings) is better than trying to choose one. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Presence (Greek: parousia ) of Christ
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Presence (Greek: parousia ) of Christ → Second Coming (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Delete this redirect because it is an unlikely search term and has an erroneous space. Presence of Christ is a redlink, but Parousia exists as a redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Extremely malformed redirect. No one is searching this. Ca talk to me! 11:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:RDAB and because definitions do not belong in page titles. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete it was an article for just over an hour and a half in 2008 and doesn't appear to contain any useful history. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Once We Were Human
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Not sure why this exists, all I get for results is a book on Amazon that has no Wikipedia page. It's not mentioned in the band page at all. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget - Retarget to Once Human (band). This site and this site both mention "Once We Were Human" as the old band name. BTW, Lauren Hart still directs to the Once Human disambiguation page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:R#DELETE #8. If you can find a reliable source that can be added to the article saying they were called that, then sure. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Reply - WP:CHEAP, both of those references are used on other Wikipedia pages, so either these are reliable, or the others need to be purged. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:R#DELETE #8. If you can find a reliable source that can be added to the article saying they were called that, then sure. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, considering the retargeting option above seems WP:MADEUP. "WP:CHEAP" doesn't apply if it is shown that the redirect is inherently unhelpful and/or misleading, which seems to be the case here. Steel1943 (talk) 19:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the band talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not mentioned anywhere in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Themes common in gay porn
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was restore. Nominating at AfD for broader input on the article. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 03:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Themes common in gay porn → Gay pornography (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
No "themes" mentioned at target, and title is also a bit ungrammatical. However, since the redirect is a {{R with history}}, then I'm not sure if deletion would be appropriate. CycloneYoris talk! 07:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Restore history and rename. This was redirected following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Themes common in gay porn which was very low participation (nom and one other) and closed as redirect despite the only !vote being "merge and delete per nom". While at the time it might have been mostly adequately covered in the target article it isn't today. As pointed out it covers many things not exclusive to gay porn, so I suggest restoring it and renaming it to form the basis of a Glossary of pornography or similarly titled article that better reflects the content - I was expecting a list of tropes based on the current title. Thryduulf (talk) 08:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Has already been at AFD, let's just put this thing to the fire. Steel1943 (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)- Eh, whatever, I'm sick of this backlog. Not closing this thing though since I don't want it to appear as an AFD nomination I made in the AFD stats trackers since I'm not vested in an opinion either way anymore. Steel1943 (talk) 03:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Restore history and rename (and cleanup). Per Thryduulf.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Restore and AfD - the article from 2006 is too poor in quality for today's standards. No objection to someone cleaning it up while at AfD. Jay 💬 15:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Joan Bau
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, target is never referred to in this way. Rusalkii (talk) 01:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This was createdc by @RafiUbeda: with summary "his name in Valencian/Catalan" but I am unable to verify that it is (happy to be proved wrong). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete unless evidence is presented. While our article makes no connection with Catalonia or Valencia obvious, both the Spanish and French Wikipedia articles note he was born in Valencia so there are no FORRED issues. [1] and [2] use both spellings, but in different parts of the article and I'd want the opinion of someone who speaks Spanish before assigning any weight. Googling "Joan Bau" singer Valencia -Wikipedia produces nothing relevant ("Joan Bau" alone produces too many irrelevant results to be useful). Thryduulf (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Betty Brook (Bear Kill tributary)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Betty Brook (Bear Kill tributary) → Betty Brook (West Kill tributary) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Wrong river in disambiguation; I moved the page. Peter James (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep {{R from move}} and tag {{R from incorrect name}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and tag per Shhhnotsoloud. The article was at this title for 7 years. Thryduulf (talk) 11:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).