Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 23

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Quorom Broadcasting → Mission Broadcasting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There has never been a company by this name. There was a Quorum Broadcasting (with a second "u", not "o") that merged into (what is now) Nexstar Media Group, but not sure this is a plausible misspelling to merit a retarget (Quorum, under any spelling, is not mentioned in the article for Mission Broadcasting). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is not a difficult one. This is not a logical redirect. People searching for Mission Broadcasting will not use this as a way to hunt for it. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Doczilla. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Listed building#Other. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• British Listed Buildings → Listed buildings in the United Kingdom  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The capitalized term refers to the website, see WP:DIFFCAPS, British castles redirects to Castles in Great Britain and Ireland but note that British Castles doesn't exist. Most similar redirects doesn't appear to exist such as Turkish Villages>Villages of Turkey so such redirects may violate WP:PANDORA. All 17 incoming links are for the website not the buildings themselves. It should probably redirect to Listed building#Other which discusses the website and similar records. It was originally a redirect to Listed buildings in England but was changed to the current target by User:Rosguill probably because there are listed buildings in Britain and the UK outside England. I'm wandering if it would qualify as notable enough for an article but otherwise it should probably be retargeted as suggested. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listed_building#Other seems like a good target. If sources are found to establish notability editors can go ahead and start an article, but the target is informative so I don't know that we need to WP:REDYES here. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Listed_building#Other, where it is mentioned. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as per Presidentman and WP:DIFFCAPS. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. It's snowing. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• .Feast of Herod → The Feast of Herod  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unambiguously created in error. Delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep,Delete However created (by me), probably useful. In fact The Feast of Herod seems to break policy (WP:THE) & should probably be renamed to this (I see I changed it in 2021 - possibly another mistake). Johnbod (talk) 15:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Did you not notice that this title has a leading period? Feast of Herod is a plausible redirect. .Feast of Herod isn't. Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Ah. no! Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The full stop at the beginning makes this implausible. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• .Delete ——Serial 16:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:G6. @Primefac: The only keep vote has been stricken since you declined the CSD nomination and the RFD could be closed as delete per WP:SNOW. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete it was at this title for about a minute in 2021 and as noted the only keep !vote has been withdrawn. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• .Delete P Aculeius (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. SIA is restored. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Trenkwalder → Modena Volley  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This isn't a good target. There too many other mentions of "Trenkwalder" in enwiki for this target to be sufficient. Delete to enable uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring this version might be an alternative. The Banner talk 13:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Severe weather with a hatnote to the song. Closing a few hours early per WP:SNOW, and since consensus is overwhelmingly clear. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bad weather → Weather  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary redirect that causes confusion with Bad Weather. I believe the 1st criterion in WP:RDEL applies. Konstantina07 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a generic term, and I had no idea there was a music song with that title, wouldn't Bad Weather be better at Bad Weather (song) to avoid generic terminology? Unless Bad Weather becomes a disambiguation page? Govvy (talk) 12:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I had no idea about it either. Moving the page might also be fair (although I suppose this should be discussed elsewhere). I am not sure how plausible of a search "bad weather" might be if you want to read about weather.

  If it's kept it should at least be re-targeted to Severe weather (or a similar article) Konstantina07 (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Severe weather as plausible synonym. I'm fine with adding a hatnote to Bad Weather in this new target. --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Severe weather and add hatnote per Lenticel. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget and add a hatnote per the above. Awkward42 (talk) [the alternate account of Thryduulf (talk)] 14:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget and add a hatnote. The song gets c. 8 views a day. I count myself as a Motown fan, & I'd never heard of it. Johnbod (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Retarget and move the song to Bad Weather (song) 14 novembre (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retrget per Lenticel. Per WP:DIFFCAPS I'd suggest the song is probably fine especially given the lower case redirect may be a bit dubious. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget With Hatnote per Lenticel. I agree that WP:DIFFCAPS is enough to keep the song where it is. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Dab is restored after the stub created. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Western Times → The Bathurst Free Press and Mining Journal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I converted this redirect to a disambiguation page but my edit was reverted by @NmWTfs85lXusaybq:. I asked for an independent review at ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Disruptive editing of disambiguation pages but the incident was archived without action. In my opinion a disambiguation page is more helpful to readers than this redirect and my edit should be restored. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• For reference, the last version as a dab page is this revision, it had entries "Western Times (Exeter), a newspaper in the United Kingdom in Exeter, Devon, England from 1829 to 1952" and "The Bathurst Free Press and Mining Journal, published in Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia, as the Western Times between 1936 and 1963". Thryduulf (talk) 11:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I have created a sourced stub for the Exeter paper, and added the content of a revised dab page on the redirect page. Can we now just close this RfD, delete the redirect, and move on? PamD 13:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Dab is restored after the stub created. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wabern railway station → Wabern bei Bern railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I converted this redirect to a disambiguation page but my edit was reverted by @NmWTfs85lXusaybq:. I asked for an independent review at ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Disruptive editing of disambiguation pages but the incident was archived without action. In my opinion a disambiguation page is more helpful to readers than this redirect and my edit should be restored. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It should be reverted to its dab page form and a stub article created for Wabern station (Hesse). The convert to a redir was done without any significant comment, other than Primary topic, which it isn't as there is no hat note on the Wabern bei Bern railway station article. Nor can I see any good justification for saying that a two platform suburban station deserves primary topic over a three platform junction station with ICE service. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • Created the stub. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 11:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Horse (company). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Horse (car) → Renault  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Speedy delete. Renault will not make its cars with the Horse or Ampere brands, it will continue using Renault and Dacia. 95.70.138.236 (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Horse (company), which is about the company partially owned by Renault. Thryduulf (talk) 11:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I initially closed this as speedy keep, since the nominating user was blocked, but I have un-done my closure as another user has made a constructive comment here before the nominator was blocked. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as per Thryduulf. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Thryduulf. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Maile66 (talk · contribs) as WP:G6. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Carlisle Bulilding → Carlisle Building  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Pointless redirect – just misspelling, no inbound links (sorry – should have nominated it just after the page move) — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 08:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @GhostInTheMachine: You may tag it with {{Db-g7}} or {{Db-self}}, and it may be speedied. Jay 💬 08:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did that too — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 09:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{Db-g7}} is the wrong tag in this particular case, because a different user contributed the article prior to the two moves (accepting the AfC submission, then fixing the error in the title). I changed it to {{db-error}}. PleaseStand (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• European hosptial → European hospital  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hosptial → Hospital  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Speedy delete due to the word "Hospital" being misspelled. 176.33.245.231 (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have tagged European hosptial as R3, as having been created 3 days back. Whereas Hosptial was created in 2018. Jay 💬 08:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Deb (talk) 08:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• European hosptial was deleted by Maile66 as WP:R3 and Lenticel subsequently closed this discussion. However, Hosptial has not been deleted so I have reopened to allow discussion on that redirect to continue. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No more likely than any other misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unlikely to be spelled this way. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• HBBS → wikt:Appendix:Internet slang  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Relisting "weak delete" nominations from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#ILYM. Still not mentioned at target. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and AfD this old article as Thryduulf suggested. Duckmather (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and send to AfD per my comment on the previous nomination and Duckmather's comment above:Weak delete HBBS. This has a surprisingly long history, but apart from 3 days in 2008 it has always been a redirect. The single revision as an article, ostensibly about a company but about half the text is about one of its products. It would not be speedily deletable under A7 as there are clear claims of singificance about the product. There are two external links, neither of which work today. Looking on archive.org, the Ohio Secretary of State site would, at best, verify existence of the company (but probably not the product) but not speak to notability. The hbbs.us domain was replaced by hoeningbigboresouth.com, which verifies the existence of the product but obviously can't speak to notability. This was the author's sole contribution to Wikipedia. I wouldn't delete it as G11 myself as it's borderline (and therefore the criterion does not apply) but would let someone else speedying it under that criterion slide, especially since this was 15 years ago and was not a BLAR (the redirect is the stable state for this title). If anyone does want to restore the content for AfD purposes though then I will support that. Thryduulf (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Just delete and do *not* restore. There is nothing salvageable about that unsourced and poorly written stub which was only visible for three days back in 2008. The link is dead and there's no sourcing available to verify its content. It could even be a hoax, for all we know; since the creator vanished without a trace and their only edit was creating the stub, which is highly suspicious. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It was not unsourced - there were two sources in the article; that they aren't still working 15 years later does not change that. It's not a hoax - I was able to verify the existence of both company and product with less than 5 minutes research (and an editor making only a single edit is not evidence of anything suspicious). Whether something is or is not notable is a question for AfD to decide, based on the availability of sources not what sources are presently in the article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Even so, it wouldn't be suitable to restore if those sources are no longer available; and the fact that the stub was only visible for three days makes it even more pointless in my opinion (not to mention that it would be a complete waste of time at AfD). CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per CycloneYoris andapart from 3 days in 2008 it has always been a redirect. If there are arguments for keeping the article, I'm open to hearing them. However, all I've read are arguments against A7 and G11, which are irrelevant as this has not been proposed for speedy deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No mention in Enwiki or Wikt. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Licking people's faces → COVID-19#Cause  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article does not establish that 'licking people's faces' was a cause of COVID-19. This is a much wider topic than COVID-19. For example, a prominent result in my research is as a facet of dog communication. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unhelpful and confusing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:B8EA:77A3:F6E8:A235 (talk) 06:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is the taste of a confusing redirect --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Konstantina07 (talk) 12:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It was a joke thing that licking people's faces would spread COVID. As such, plausible redirect. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. COVID-19 isn't even spread that way. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 08:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unhelpful and confusing, while maybe a joke it is not mentioned at target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redirect is not exclusive to the target. Steel1943 (talk) 01:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Johnc → John Carmack  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

implausible? would this be like "jimmyw" for jimbo wales? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The only connection I can find between the two is that "johnc" forms part of Carmack's email address. Googling "Johnc" brings up hits for a (likely) non-notable musician. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As this would be an extremely rare if not unused redirect to many people. StaleGuy22 (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is not an implausible search term, and it's not just part of an email address. Carmack made extensive use of his .plan file to communicate with the software and game development communities, similar to blogging. This was very well known at the time, and his username at id Software was used as an example in Slackware Linux Essentials, 1st Edition, a book that I liked to read in print again and again. I have added the username to the article (citing a different book that is more likely to be acceptable, given that the article is a BLP). PleaseStand (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow time to respond to the late keep
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems a very unlikely redirect to me, and more importantly could cause confusion. Deb (talk) 08:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Presidentman and Deb. Just a part of an email ID. Jay 💬 06:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 文化 → Bunka  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a two-character word that means 'culture' in both Chinese and Japanese. It should not redirect to a specific Japanese era—I would probably delete it. Remsense诉 01:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RLOTE. A dab isn't warranted either: The entry of Culture fails WP:DABMENTION and WP:DABDIC. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep we don't appear to have another article this could point to wikt:en:文化. This certainly cannot refer to culture on English Wikipedia, as that would fail WP:RFOREIGN; if there are any other valid topics, it can be turned into a WP:CJKV disambiguation page -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2030 FIFA World Cup Argentina-Morocco-Paraguay-Portugal-Spain-Uruguay → 2030 FIFA World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• FIFA World Cup Argentina, Morocco, Paraguay, Portugal, Spain, and Uruguay 2030 → 2030 FIFA World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• FIFA World Cup Argentina, Morocco, Paraguay, Portugal, Spain, Uruguay 2030 → 2030 FIFA World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Argentina-Morocco-Paraguay-Portugal-Spain-Uruguay 2030 → 2030 FIFA World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Same reason that FIFA World Cup Argentina–Morocco–Paraguay–Portugal–Spain–Uruguay 2030 was deleted: unlikely search term that does not aid in navigation. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per nom and previous comments, too long to be sensible search terms. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 16:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as unlikely search terms. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• كنيسة → Church (building)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:FORRED. The target subject does not have affinity with any particular language. Steel1943 (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Deb (talk) 09:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If there were a target about churches in the Arab world generally I'd think otherwise, but there isn't. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For WP:FORRED 14 novembre (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: WP:FORRED, most countries have churches, so there's not specific tie to this language. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).