Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Technogypsie → Digital nomad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The previous discussion on this seemed to be to merge into digital nomad; however, no mention of this term is on the subject page. I would propose deleting this until some serious RS can be found for this term. GnocchiFan (talk) 22:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It doesn't seem like any content was actually merged. And the original article was still about the same topic, just using a synonymous term, with much poorer content and references. The current article is superior in every way. It just seems to be a little-used alternate term, difficult to find any reliable sourcing for, so no real harm in deleting. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• INDIA → India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

If someone types in INDIA in all caps, I doubt they're looking for the country. I think this should be retargeted to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA, as shown in their logo) per WP:DIFFCAPS. Cremastra (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support It is possible that a reader typing "INDIA" in the searchbox just has their capslock on and that they in fact want to read about the country rather than the recently formed political alliance but that can be easily addressed by adding a {{For}} hatnote at the alliance page. Alternatively, the all-caps INDIA can be made into a disambiguation page, or can continue to redirect to the country article and a hat note can be added to that article, but IMO those approaches are less desirable for reasons I can spell out if needed. Abecedare (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep; contra the nom and Abecedare, I think it's pretty common for people to all-caps country names. For example, we have longstanding redirects that target the respective country articles, such as UNITED STATES, BRAZIL, CANADA, CHINA, RUSSIA, and I could go on and on. Duckmather (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree, but in those cases the term is not ambiguous, so the redirect is harmless and WP:CHEAP (if slightly weird). There is no C.A.N.A.D.A. or R.U.S.S.I.A., so WP:DIFFCAPS is not applicable. Cremastra (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose If We want then more accurate would to create a new redirect page as INDIA Alliance, but the more common redirect convention which exists for all countries can't be change for a particular just because a similar related political alliance exists. And as rightly said @Abecedare, if typing INDIA (with caps on), more likely ( globally not just for specific country people) they might be searching for a country than a political entity. So i suggest not to change this redirect.

  Curious man123 (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  INDIA Alliance is a redundancy; the "A" stands for "Alliance". Cremastra (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. I question the usefulness of other all-caps redirects, but either way, in this case, the acronym is actually used for the name of something, so let that be the more appropriate target. The existing hatnote at the organization page can be changed to note that "INDIA" redirects there...I'm not sure why there's already one for the version with periods. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, this term applies specifically to the allcaps and it is likely people will deliberately search it with the all caps. This is not a novel idea: WASP and Wasp are different. I was wondering if retargeting to India (disambiguation) might help but it puts the political alliance a long way down the page. CMD (talk) 02:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance where the hatnote there addresses things. Please note that the proposed target received half the pageviews of India itself last month. Were it a regular article with 1/5,000th the visitors, my recommendation would be completely different. J947 ‡ ^edits 03:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support The majority of sources are referring to it as INDIA (though some Indian newspapers are using I.N.D.I.A.) so I agree this is consistent with how people will search for it right now. However, I question how long the 'alliance' will continue to be in the spotlight once the election is over. For what its worth, less coverage in the news could mean fewer people searching for the alliance on wiki (in all caps). But that's a weak hunch and a hatnote on the alliance page should ultimately solve for most possible scenarios. Schwinnspeed (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well unless the country is called with the all caps its likely this will remain the only usage even if renamed. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget as per nom. Not only does WP:DIFFCAPS apply-- if someone types INDIA in in all caps I do feel like they're more likely to be referring to an acronym than the India article-- but if Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance didn't exist as an article, I'd reccommend this to be deleted as per WP:RCAPS-- which itself says to keep WP:DIFFCAPS in mind. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget, if someone doesn't remember the full name but just the acronym "INDIA", it's likely they'll type that. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retraget even if the country is written in all caps as a stylization like maps etc its not actually called like this and unlikely to be search for like this while the alliance is likely and I'd say the redirect might not be needed anyway and should be deleted if the alliance didn't exist but since it does we can just retarget. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 23:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom. INDIA averaged 22 hits per day last year and 30 this year, compared to 4-8 per day each for RUSSIA, CANADA, UNITED STATES, FRANCE and BRAZIL. It seems likely that most people landing on INDIA want something other than the country. Station1 (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Adding a quote here on behalf of @Loveforwiki:, who removed the RfD tag from the redirect with the edit summary "Obviously it should be redirected to country India." Cremastra (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Surfjam Steve → Sufjan Stevens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

bruh, 16 years with this redirect from a fake name for Sufjan Stevens? Yilku1 (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The nickname appears as early as a 2005 forum discussion: Harmony Central. Unfortunately, it's also a parody name by another artist: Bandcamp. For the ambiguity, low pageviews and unhelpfulness as a search term (not even one Google page full of results for an exact search), delete. Air on White (talk) 00:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I look forward to seeing this on WP:DAFT. Free Realist 9 (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kakaka → Evil laughter  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Kakaka isn't necessarily an evil laugh, as much as kekeke or jajaja aren't. It is an onomatopoeia of kkk in Brazil, derived from quá-quá-quá, according to Wiktionary. Soares2000 (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I can't find good targets here at en.wiki. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment LOL#Commonly_used_equivalents_in_other_languages, is a possibility, but I feel like it is a stretch. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• If someone can substantiate/source the kkk -> kakaka thing in Brazil, add it to LOL#Commonly_used_equivalents_in_other_languages and Retarget there. Otherwise, delete. Fieari (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  wiktionary has nothing on a direct link between "kkk" and "kakaka" besides an unsourced, unquoted example on "ka", experience in brazil tells me people do not want to type more letters. if you want to argue in favor of "ka" as a phonetic spelling of the letter k in portuguese, go ahead, i guess. either way, weak retarget to lol if it can be proven that anyone uses it, delete otherwise cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment purely in academic interest - there actually was an AfD in 2005 where the closer made a bold decision to redirect. Jay 💬 17:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. Thryduulf (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Sweartgar → Sverker of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar I → Sverker I of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar II → Sverker II of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar II of Sweden → Sverker II of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar I of Sweden → Sverker I of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar of Sweden → Sverker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar of Sweden (disambiguation) → Sverker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sweartgar the Elder → Sverker I of Sweden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: This is supposed to be a variant of Sverker, a name for two Swedish kings. However, no reliable sources seem to use this name. From the article Sverker I of Sweden, this was deleted already in 2013 due to lack of sources. There have been similar issues with other articles related to names of medieval Swedes, see e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richardice of Sweden. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Several reliable sources are available to substantiate this as a legitimate English exonym for Swedish Sverker, which would be enough for a redirect, if not a mention in the articles. Among them: Nordische Personnamen in England; Erik Björkman; Halle, 1910, (new ed. ISBN 139783747703144); Continental Germanic Personal Names in Old and Middle English Times; Thorvald Forssner; Upsala, 1916, L390900; The Pre Conquest Personal Names of Doomesday Book; 0lof van Feilitzen; Upsala, 1937, L356736: Scandinavian Personal Names in Lincolnshire & Yorkshire; Gillian Fellows-Jensen; Copenhagen, 1968, L8111566 - Where shall we put them? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Of these refs, I have access to the first, the second and the last one. In the first one, variants like Swartgar and Swertgar are listed on p.136, but there is no Sweartgar. The second and the last reference do not seem to contain anything resembling Sweartgar. The Domesday book names are also searchable at [1], but again, there does not seem to be any name resembling Sweartgar. Even if the name existed in such tomes, the criterion 8 of WP:R#DELETE would be applicable. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 11:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Comment refactored on 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I had missed other pages which include this name: All pages with titles beginning with Sweartgar. If there is a consensus to delete this page, I would request them to be deleted also, although I don't know how to amend the RfD. They were all created by User:Againme or SergeWoodzing, both of whom have been alerted. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I've gone ahead and bundled the other identified redirects into this discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom and subsequent explanation. Jay 💬 17:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Psychological stress. While the consensus was a bit dispersed, several editors agreed that the primary topic of this title was distinct due to its capitalization from any of the entries at Stressed Out (disambiguation). Adding a hatnote to the disambiguation page at the new target. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Stressed out → Stressed Out (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has targeted Psychological stress, Stressed Out (disambiguation) and Stressed Out, the Twenty One Pilots song. Its was pointing to the DAB from 2019 until last month and I changed it back to the DAB today. In terms of the discussions it seems there is a consensus that the Twenty One Pilots song is primary for the title case version per WP:DIFFCAPS, see discussions at Talk:Stressed Out and an older one at Talk:Stressed Out (A Tribe Called Quest song)#Requested move 26 November 2015. In terms of Psychological stress I understand we aren't a dictionary but at the same time it could be argued that its safest to disambiguate the lower case. In terms of the options, option A, target Twenty One Pilots song, option B, target DAB, option C, target Psychological stress. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• B either the generic meaning or Twenty One Pilots song could be primary so its probably best to have no primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Option A, revert back to Stressed Out. This is the primary topic, and was the target of the Stressed out redirect until an undiscussed edit by User:Crouch, Swale in 2019.[2] Previous RMs discussing Stressed Out (Twenty One Pilots song) and Stressed Out (A Tribe Called Quest song) are not relevant to the lowercase Stressed out. I see no evidence for DIFFCAPS here; all the articles at the Stressed Out (disambiguation) dabpage are spelled with both capital letters. 162 etc. (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @162 etc.: The closer of the 1st RM Special:Diff/694445799 created a redirect to Stress (psychological) in 2015 and it was changed to the DAB page in 2016 and ended up targeting the Twenty One Pilots song as it was moved to the base name in September 2016 which seems to have been an error from the page move or just people not thinking DIFFCAPS was appropriate. It was changed back to the DAB by me in 2019 and stayed this way until last month when you changed it to the Twenty One Pilots song. I then changed it back to the DAB. So the undiscussed change to target the Twenty One Pilots song need discussion here as it could arguable be changed back to the original target. If all the uses were upper case and Psychological stress didn't exist I agree the default would be to follow the primary topic title case but there is a generic meaning though as noted I'm not sure how likely it is. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• A per 162. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 13:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• C with a hatnote to the disambiguation page. At this capitalisation, and capitalisation matters, my judgement is that most readers are looking for the feeling of psychological stress and not a song. There's no merit in B because all the entries on the dab page are Title Case. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• With fewer than one hit per day on average, no incoming links and no article that would actually be titled "stressed out", it could really be deleted (option D, anyone?). Although capitalization certainly does matter, it's also true searchers often do skip using the shift key. If "stressed out" really were a likely alternative search term for "psychological stress", I'd say proper capitalization wins out, but I don't see many readers expecting that, and I'd hate to put a hatnote on psychological stress pointing to list of songs, so I'd avoid option C. And just as we shouldn't assume searchers skipping the shift key want a lower-case article, we also shouldn't assume they want the upper-case title, even though with a hatnote already on Stressed Out, that's less of an issue. So option A is reasonable, but because capitalization matters and because we can't say with certainty what most of the tiny number of readers landing on the redirect want, absent deletion I lean toward option B. Station1 (talk) 06:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Should Stressed out be deleted, typing "stressed out" in search would result in a reader reaching the page at Stressed Out. This means that "option D" would result in the same thing as option A. 162 etc. (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a good point. And I suppose someone would just recreate a redirect eventually anyway. Station1 (talk) 23:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• C per Shhh. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• B, but move Stressed Out (disambiguation) to Stressed out. The lowercase should be the base page name where a lowercase sense exists. BD2412 T 18:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Target to Stressed Out, regardless of whether that's kept as the current primary topic, or made into a dab page as primary. Reward the folks looking for something specifically named this. I suspect the vast majority of folks looking for information about psychological stress are going to just look up "stress" instead (already a dab page). 35.139.154.158 (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• C - Sorry that this is spreading out the consensus more, but I really and STRONGLY agree with Shhh's assessment that capitalization matters, and that psychological stress is the best target for this particular capitalization. As a secondary option, I would grudgingly accept the disambiguation page, but I strongly object to making this target the song as the primary topic. Capitalization matters! I also object to deletion, as there really should be a way for a user to easily reach psychological stress from this search string, and the default search is unlikely to get there easily. Fieari (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• C. When not written in title case, psychological stress is the clear primary topic and we do our readers a disservice by not taking them there. A hatnote to the dab page and song will cater for everyone not looking for the primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• C per Thryduulf. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• B, in the sense given by BD2412. If we can not decide which the best meaning... disambiguate! That is: delete, move Stressed Out (disambiguation) to this name, optionally history merge if it does not make a mess. - Nabla (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep and restored content at the target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Pussy in bio → X (social network)#Malicious and fake accounts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• PUSSY IN BIO → X (social network)#Malicious and fake accounts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• P U S S Y I N B I O → X (social network)#Malicious and fake accounts  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Section with information about this subject was removed (Special:Diff/1227241681) by FMSky. J3133 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rusalkii (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and restore cited content to the article, or to a comparable article on tactics of malicious and fake social media accounts. The sudden ubiquity of these specific phrases was the subject of coverage in reliable sources. Removal on "notability" grounds is tantamount to whitewashing. The content that was deleted is as follows:

Additional sources can be found reporting on this, and it is even the topic of its own Know Your Meme page, here. BD2412 T 18:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and restore as per BD2412. Five seconds of sleuthing reveals that J3133 (yes, the very user that created this RfD) added the information removed by FMSky in the very edit prior to FMSky removing it (to the point where FMSky's edit was pretty much a WP:Revert. However, five MORE seconds of sleuthing reveals that J3133 was moving the information from Twitter to X (social network)-- here is the edit where J3133 removed the info from the Twitter article, in an effort to move the info to the X article.
  The information does belong in the X article, not the Twitter article-- the report the content cites was posted in March 2024, 8 months after Twitter was renamed to X. It should be restored to the X article, and the redirects kept. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Irrelevant garbage, not needed, WP:NOTEVERYTHING --FMSky (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you're going to cite WP:NOT, it would really behoove you to specify what part of that policy the content violates, lest you appear to merely be trying to censor the Internet, or whitewash a company's page. This is neutrally presented and well-cited content. BD2412 T 22:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and restore per BD2412 and Lunamann. Thryduulf (talk) 01:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and restore per above. Fieari (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and restore per above. Free Realist 9 (talk) 00:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Khogyani (article disambiguation) → Khogyani  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Disambiguator is so unlikely and nonstandard that it's not helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This isn't something that anyone is going to search for or use. Gonnym (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Restore Gastrosexuality and retarget Gastrosexual to it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Gastrosexual → Metrosexual  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Gastrosexuality → Metrosexual  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned. Retarget to wikt:gastrosexual if there's no mention anywhere else. --MikutoH ^talk! 04:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft redirect Gastrosexual to wikt, and delete Gastrosexuality. Not mentioned anywhere in enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment. Gastrosexuality existed as its own page before, though the correct term is gastrosexual because it's named in reference to lifestyles like lumbersexual, spornosexual, retrosexual, cosmosexual, frustrosexual, megasexual, ubersexual, ultrasexual, macrosexual, cinesexual, machosexual, and many others. --MikutoH ^talk! 19:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of Gastrosexuality?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. If you want to send the latter to AFD, or even treat it as a soft delete/expired PROD, I don't think that's unreasonable either. I also don't think a soft redir to Wiktionary serves any useful purpose here, and just impedes normal searching. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Gastrosexual to wiktionary, delete other. Wiktionary contains useful information about the subject. I am not sure how this would impede normal searching. The history is useless since the text was not incoporated anywhere, and thus carries no attribution issues in deletion. Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore Gastrosexuality without prejudice to AfD. The discussion cited was just one person saying "do you mind?" and the other saying "I don't mind", that's not consensus for deletion. Gastrosexual should target Gastrosexuality if it is kept or wiktionary if it isn't. Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore Gastrosexuality and retarget Gastrosexual to the restored Gastrosexuality per Thryduulf. Jay 💬 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Population Zero. Arguments in favor of disambiguating should be made at the target's talk page, and possibly open an RM there. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Population 0 → Stellar population  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not appear at the target. Only mention I could find is on Wiktionary at wikt:frozen star. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• comment would this be a plausible synonym for Population Zero? --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm quite skeptical one that stuff since it does make some sense but barely anyone really does it. Okmrman (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "0" and "Zero" could be searched either way. Unless someone actually sees the logo of them they are unlikely to know which uses which term and even still they may assume we always use numbers or letters. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Appears to be a speculative term for a future star population, but couldn't find any published research on it. "Population 0" was mentioned once as a synonym for Population III stars, but this could stem from a misreading of this paper calling them "Zero-population stars". Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate there is also Aftermath: Population Zero so maybe Population Zero should be a DAB. I used to use "Population Zero" to get to Aftermath: Population Zero and suddenly found a different article there. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak disambiguate per Crouch's findings (and also maybe this is gallows humor but the first thing I thought of was Extinction or especially Human extinction, so that should be added as well). Duckmather (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes Extinction and Human extinction should be included on the DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate - There are enough potential targets that a DAB would be worthwhile. I don't find this an implausible search string either. Fieari (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Population Zero. The disambiguation arguments should really be at a RM for that article. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Population Zero. It looks like the film is the clear primary topic here. I'm not finding evidence that this term is actually used to refer to extinctions of any kind, human or otherwise. A hatnote could be added for Aftermath: Population Zero if desired. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Population Zero per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Population Zero without prejudice to hatnotes or a non-primary disambiguation page. The film does seem to be the primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 09:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Population Zero as it's clearly the primary topic. I can definitely see a hatnote or disambig page being made, but Population Zero is clearly the primary target. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• If this is closed as "retarget" to the film I guess it will be closed without prejudice of a RM there. "Population Zero" rather than "Population 0" would seem a more appropriate title for a DAB though I guess it doesn't matter too much as long as "Population Zero" redirected to it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Population Zero as appears most suitable. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).