Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
June 22
Let
and
Then, assuming convergence, we have
Thus, for
we have
for instance. Now, for
we have
and
My question would be with what constant to replace
in general, for different values of A and B, so that the limit in question should converge to a finite non-zero quantity. In other words, if
what is the general formula for
? Thank you. — 79.118.171.25 (talk) 22:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently,
and the limit in question is the square root of the Paris constant. — 79.118.171.25 (talk) 03:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]- I get
. My idea is to let
and write its recurrence formula. The behavior for small
is dictated by the linear term of its Maclaurin series.
From there it's not hard to understand the behavior of
and find
. Egnau (talk) 03:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]- I arrived just these past few minutes at the same conclusion, and wanted to post it, but was unable to connect. :-) Thanks ! — 79.113.226.120 (talk) 03:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- And in general, for
we have
where
is a root of
— 79.113.226.120 (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved