Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Shortcuts

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Add a new request
Remove all requests

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.

Uncontroversial technical requests

Most requests should be placed below this heading.
  • Kandivali → Kandivli (currently a redirect back to Kandivali) (move · discuss) – undiscussed move 2409:40C0:6B:794:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 08:27, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am seeing three different spellings of this city's name in English sources: Kandivli, Kandivali, and Kandivili. See also Kandivli railway station which uses two of those, including in an image file. This is probably the result of poor translation over the years, as errors were repeated among media sources. The correct spelling can probably be obtained from a local resident, or... maybe this is the answer. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:55, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a tough one... The long-term title for 15+ years until 2023, was the present one, Kandivali but then there was a bold (and unexplained) move followed by a reversion, and then another bold move by the same editor (who's since been blocked) four days later, which wasn't spotted. As such, despite Kandivli being the name for almost two years, I think the Kandivali has a definite claim to be the stable title based on the fact that a challenge was ignored back then.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:59, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.

Contested technical requests

Do not insert new requests in this section. Only move requests here if the requested move has been contested.
Wikipedia basically never formats a title in a way as redundant as this – i.e., including an acronym and its corresponding spelled-out words. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuripenjwen Given the edit history, it would great if you have more sources before pushing this to mainspace – robertsky (talk) 06:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@DataNomad Note the above. – robertsky (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was previously contested here and an RM is open on the talk page. Tenshi! (Talk page) 15:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like a class of substances. There is an exception in WP:SINGULAR for such cases. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there is a chembox for the specific compound, but then most of the body of the article is about the class. The singular seems consistent with articles for analogous compounds, but happy to discuss at RM (at least, there seems to be enough uncertainty here to merit an RM). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdewman6 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is definitely potentially controversial and should go through a normal RM. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Contentious topic partially nominated for deletion (twice). Article has only existed for a few days. Spirited discussion on the article's Talk page. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems WP:PCM then. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Al-Waqīmī This was moved in 2019, and subsequently confirmed in an RM (Talk:2019_India–Pakistan_border_skirmishes/Archive_6#Requested_move_27_January_2020). We can only revert recent moves here. Please open an RM by clicking the "discuss" link in your requests if you wish to pursue this further. Toadspike [Talk] 18:53, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Halbared This move was performed in February 2024 – the current title has been stable for over a year, which is even longer than it was at the previous title for. We can only revert recent undiscussed moves here; please open an RM to discuss this by clicking the "discuss" link in your request. Toadspike [Talk] 18:56, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But, it doesn't appear Yusuke Suzuki (footballer) was deleted? Mdewman6 (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per the logs, it had been WP:PRODded and was undeleted following WP:RFU#Yusuke Suzuki (footballer). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For whatever reason, the footballer article currently exists, so the provided rationale is not currently a valid reason for renaming the race walker article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a page mover.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests&oldid=1288791568"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.