Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ashill

• Ashill (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Serendipodous (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Ckatz (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: G

• Supporting evidence: On the Solar System talk page the three users seem to fit into three grades.

1. Ashill is the most reasonable and verbose
2. Serendipodous does little but nay-say things, and doesn't offer counter-arguments, or offers simple support statements. Counter arguments which are offered have stupid points.
3. Ckatz has made one contribution to the talk page from this point forward, but imposes the "consensus" view of the other two, when the discussion hasn't conclude and logical points remain unchallenged. Ashill then concretely supports Ckatz's edits when he had previously shown some flexibility.

At best, three users are operating a cabal. -HarryAlffa (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Declined - total lack of evidence of abuse and  CheckUser is not for fishing. I wish we could detect cabals, but Checkuser just can't do that! :) - Alison ^❤ 05:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]