Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bogorm

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

closed as additional comment left below

Bogorm

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 18:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Bogorm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
209.172.104.100 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter: FG

Supporting evidence: I need to verify if I should revert a block extension:

Bogorm was recently briefly blocked by Tiptoety (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) and upon expiry, he/she immediately launched into attacks on Tiptoety, both on his talk page, and bringing ridiculous allegations to ANI.

This eventually led to me blocking Bogorm, immediately after which, this IP popped up and made similar allegations on my talk page. Both unrelated user Biophys (talk · contribs) [1] and I concluded that the IP was Bogorm (per WP:Duck), which Bogorm denies.

As a result, I extended Bogorm's block and if I was incorrect, I should reduce it back to the original length I had set. Please verify that I made the right call or prove me wrong. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

209.172.104.100 is probably a proxy of some kind and I have blocked it for 6 months. As such, a relationship between these users is Inconclusive. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 18:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I think this pretty much covers it though. Tiptoety ^talk 19:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either that was Bogorm, or that was his impostor who acted very quickly to get Bogorm blocked for block evasion. Either way, it was right to block this IP.Biophys (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Note:Clarifying my earlier comment about the attack on Tiptoety on his talk page, here is the diff [2], and the ANI thread archived here. Toddst1 (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you claim further that the diff is from "his talk page" ? Bogorm (talk) 14:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]