Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LakeOswego

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LakeOswego}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

LakeOswego

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 03:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/LakeOswego. The closure of this AfD likely will end up at WP:DRV, so it would be useful to know just how many of these new or seldom-used accounts that appeared to vote keep are actually abusive sockpuppets. Thanks, — Scientizzle 03:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The DRV is open and there's now 3 more on this list... — Scientizzle 07:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added User:1215. They started the deletion review within their first few edits. How odd is that? Jehochman Talk 11:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think CheckUser will be useless here. See [1], [2] and a Google search, lots of weird stuff pops up here, but most obvious is this (scroll down a bit). "My listing in Wikipedia is being considered for deletion because some readers have labeled me a conspiracy theorist and a promoter of quack cancer cures. These people undoubtedly are well intentioned but suffering from a severe case of knowledge deficiency. If you are inclined, please go to the Wikipedia web site and enter a statement of support. Hopefully, there will be enough of these to offset the voices of ignorance. Here's how: (1) go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin; (2) click on Discussion; (3) set up a user name and password; (4) log in and submit your statement. Thank you." LegitimateSock (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Inconclusive - all basically SPAs and the comments above seem to corroborate that - Alison ❤ 23:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. LegitimateSock seems to indicate that there is a lot of canvassing going on here, which is supported by the finding. Now that the article of interest has been deleted and salted, I expect things will calm down. The DRV was snow closed, endorse. Jehochman Talk 23:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/LakeOswego&oldid=1144624349"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LakeOswego, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.