Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Peroxisome

• Peroxisome (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• WP User 29 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ClearCase Guy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

Peroxisome (talk · contribs) was recently blocked indefinitely for trolling. Shortly thereafter, WP User 29 (talk · contribs) appeared at the community sanction noticeboard to repeat many of Peroxisome's arguments and to agitate against a ban on one of his allies. I believe that WP User 29 is likely a sockpuppet of Peroxisome being used to evade his block. MastCell ^Talk 16:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding ClearCase Guy (talk · contribs) - second edit was to jump into the WP:CSN discussion from Peroxisome's POV, and third edit was to defend Peroxisome on Peroxisome's talk page. MastCell ^Talk 18:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with this request. I hope that someone will check this out, and put it to rest. Like most of MastCell's very prolific accusations against his fellow editors, I'm sure there is nothing to it. Peroxisome, ClearCase Guy, WP User 29, myself, and a few other editors don't happen to share MastCell's POV that the Steven Milloy article should be overwhelmingly critical of Mr. Milloy, instead of balanced with evenhanded treatment of criticism and praise. That doesn't make us ogres. NCdave 22:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Unrelated, geographically. --Deskana (apples) 22:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]